re: Constitutional Amendments

quote:

---

The 32nd Amendment would make proposing and ratifying future amendments a little easier.

---

frick. No. One of the biggest disasters was allowing direct election of Senators. NOTHING can be population driven. The entire structure of our Republic was designed to protect the rights of the minority against the tyranny of the majority. You think Rhode Island would agree to be pushed around by Virginia if there weren't checks on the tyranny of the majority?

quote:

---

The 29th Amendment would allow for legislative vetoes of executive and regulatory actions.

---

That's horseshite. Read some of the bills Congress passes. They explicitly give away authority to regulatory agencies by permitting the regulatory agencies to execute their duties "as needed."

quote:

---

The 29th Amendment ... LOVE THIS ONE! Curb the presidential powers

---

No. Presidential power is already supposed to be limited by Article II. Because congress and the courts have abdicated authority, there are extensive EO being used.

quote:

---

“Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” as cause for impeachment with “serious criminal acts, or for serious abuse of the public trust.

---

This will be defined by whomever has power. Hard pass. A "serious criminal act" could be defined as dead-naming a tranny.

We have extremely simple amendments that are interpreted wildly differently. "Congress shall not" just means the Department of Justice, authorized by Congress, shall violate our rights through administrative process.