- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Madison Brooks Case - A Discussion Regarding Alcohol and Consent
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
One has to be the offender otherwise there’s no crime. One has constructive knowledge of lack of consent and therefore wouldn’t be raped himself
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 11:09 am
1
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:14 am to Proximo
quote:
One has to be the offender otherwise there’s no crime.
Are you saying a person has to be an offender (via breaking laws) for a crime, or that ONLY one of the 2 can be an offender? Because the 2nd part is wrong.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News