Started By
Message

re: Madison Brooks Case - A Discussion Regarding Alcohol and Consent

Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:03 am to
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8630 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Intoxication

The fact of an intoxicated or drugged condition of the offender at the time of the commission of the crime is immaterial, except as follows:

(1) Where the production of the intoxicated or drugged condition has been involuntary, and the circumstances indicate this condition is the direct cause of the commission of the crime, the offender is exempt from criminal responsibility.

(2) Where the circumstances indicate that an intoxicated or drugged condition has precluded the presence of a specific criminal intent or of special knowledge required in a particular crime, this fact constitutes a defense to a prosecution for that crime.


And just FYI, rape (in all forms) requires a general intent, not specific intent. So Paragraph 2 wouldn't apply in these scenarios.
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 11:05 am
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29347 posts
Posted on 1/30/23 at 11:09 am to
quote:

And just FYI, rape (in all forms) requires a general intent, not specific intent.


That I got....however aren't we talking about 2 victims and 2 offenders if both parties are above the BAC limit since neither can give consent?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram