Started By
Message

re: trump lawsuit vs clinton is frivolous.

Posted on 1/20/23 at 11:48 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49043 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

If you get a ruling against you, attack the judges.


Dude, this judge referenced cases not in front of him and admitted his decision was influenced by them.

His partisan decision isn’t a conspiracy or even in question. He declared it for the world to read.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Dude, this judge referenced cases not in front of him and admitted his decision was influenced by them.

His partisan decision isn’t a conspiracy or even in question. He declared it for the world to read.
I've not litigated much regarding this sort of sanctions, but would "pattern of behavior" not be a factor that the Judge can consider ... especially if Clinton's attorneys presented those other dismissals and/or sanctions into evidence?

I am not certain that he can just "take judicial notice" of every oddball news article about dismissal of some Trump lawsuit, but Clinton's lawyers seem competent, and I would be surprised if they did not get the evidence of other cases in front of the Judge in proper form.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80549 posts
Posted on 1/20/23 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Dude, this judge referenced cases not in front of him and admitted his decision was influenced by them.


Can judges not take judicial notice of other litigation when determining whether something fits into a pattern of behavior?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram