We didn’t have a running back in the top 20 of the SEC in yards or scoring and we gave up lots of sacks but the OL was “fine”. lol. Yeah, yeah I know, all the sacks was cause our QB held the ball to long. lol

quote:
JD was fricking terrible

JD was actually the only person in the LSU backfield who actually had some reasonably good scoring and rushing stats and he ranked 6 out of 14 of SEC passers

3600 total yards, 27 total touchdowns, a passing percentage of almost 70%, three interceptions, team player voted most valuable by his teammates, and helping to guide our LSU to the West title in no way equates to a bad or terrible performance. Anyone who thinks so is either a troll or a few cards short of a full deck when it comes to SEC football.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Fat Bastard

coach, investor, gambler

Member since Mar 2009

73733 posts

Posted on 12/26/22 at 1:35 pm to Lonnie4LSU

quote:
Yeah, yeah I know, all the sacks was cause our QB held the ball to long. lol

the OL got better and better from game 1 onward. so the O line never gave him gobs of time? and when they did those were all coverage sacks? Nobody open? LOLOL. You expect them to always stop blitzes? jd5 could not help with hot routes on those??why not?

Ya know how i know you do not know What you are watching?

quote:
a passing percentage of almost 70%,

what was his intermediate and deep ball percentages? you provide numbers seriously flawed because of his short game. just like he did at ASU. his intermediate numbers at ASU were UNDER 50%.

quote:
Anyone who thinks so is either a troll or a few cards short of a full deck when it comes to SEC football.

IRONY coming from you thinking those stats equates him being a good downfield passer and reader of defenses and not limiting the overall ability of the O once defenses make adjustments like they did. Again, thanks for proving you did not watch any games.