- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The 2003 defensive formula
Posted on 11/4/08 at 10:27 pm to therocketscientist
Posted on 11/4/08 at 10:27 pm to therocketscientist
'03 D set the bar very, very high. And I would argue that its talent/experience wasn't too different than this year's. IOW, the difference in performance is not explained by raw talent or experience.
The secondary had two converted WR's (Hunt and Webster) and a true Fr (Landry), only average LB's (Thomas, Vaughn, Alexander), but an absolutely killer DL.
The secondary had two converted WR's (Hunt and Webster) and a true Fr (Landry), only average LB's (Thomas, Vaughn, Alexander), but an absolutely killer DL.
2
Posted on 11/4/08 at 10:36 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
IOW
?
Posted on 11/4/08 at 11:07 pm to AlwysATgr
Just WOW. If you think Jai Eugene and Chris Hawkins are anywhere near the talent level of Corey Webster and Travis Daniels, you obviously have not seen any football this year.
The CB position is the absolute number one reason this D is not very good.
The CB position is the absolute number one reason this D is not very good.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News