- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: American Bar Association drops LSAT requirement for Law School admissions
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:14 pm to Joshjrn
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:14 pm to Joshjrn
quote:That's your opinion, not a fact, and it's wrong. An abysmal score would have kept you out of most law schools.
Please expound on why making a test non-mandatory when the score has always been, for lack of a better description, non mandatory
As I said, this will produce an even wider gulf between lawyers who attended different levels of law school. Some poor guy's public defender just got a bit dumber.
And of course, once again, they're saying that they have to lower the bar, yet again, because blacks are too dumb to pass or even prepare for the test.
This is classic CRT. If you read their literature (Crenshaw and Kennedy especially), qualification doesn't matter. All that does is 'diversity.' The CRT advocates don't care whether or not the tokens are capable. Their words, not mine.
1
Posted on 11/20/22 at 12:21 pm to blueboy
quote:
That's your opinion, not a fact, and it's wrong. An abysmal score would have kept you out of most law schools.
No, what is said is objective fact. While any law school could exclude based on LSAT, none were required to exclude based on LSAT score. Going forward, any law school can exclude based on LSAT score, but they are no longer required to request a score at all. The only change is that, previously, law schools were required to request an LSAT score that they were free to ignore as they chose. Now, they no longer have to request it if they don't want to. That's it.
quote:
As I said, this will produce an even wider gulf between lawyers who attended different levels of law school. Some poor guy's public defender just got a bit dumber.
And of course, once again, they're saying that they have to lower the bar, yet again, because blacks are too dumb to pass or even prepare for the test.
This is classic CRT. If you read their literature (Crenshaw and Kennedy especially), qualification doesn't matter. All that does is 'diversity.' The CRT advocates don't care whether or not the tokens are capable. Their words, not mine.
Yes, I know you said it, as a conclusory statement. You simply haven't explained how you reached that conclusion.
This post was edited on 11/20/22 at 12:23 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News