Started By
Message

re: Brooks had possession

Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:29 am to
Posted by tgrgrd00
Kenner, LA
Member since Jun 2004
8710 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:29 am to
quote:

But possession also does not simply mean having the ball in your hands. If it did, knocking a ball out of a receiver’s hands in the endzone would still result in a TD. And knocking a ball out of a receiver’s hands anywhere else on the field would result in a fumble.



Isn't this supposed rule saying it's out of bounds because the player possesed the ball while out of bounds so it's dead?

How is simply touching the ball possession for 1 player but 2 hands on the ball not possession for the other?

Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
15874 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 11:31 am to
quote:

How is simply touching the ball possession for 1 player but 2 hands on the ball not possession for the other?


What? Nobody is saying the Bama player who touched the ball while being OOB possessed the ball.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9763 posts
Posted on 11/6/22 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Isn't this supposed rule saying it's out of bounds because the player possesed the ball while out of bounds so it's dead?

Different rule.

The rule you’re talking about is saying it’s out of bounds because if a loose ball touches anything out of bounds (including a player) it’s dead. That part is pretty cut and dry.

The question is whether it was still a loose ball at the point when the Bama player touched it. And THAT part comes down to whether Brooks had established possession of the ball before the Bama player touched it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram