Started By
Message

re: Tweet about as accurate as can be regarding Kelly to LSU

Posted on 10/28/22 at 10:46 am to
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
6019 posts
Posted on 10/28/22 at 10:46 am to
quote:

It’s pretty simple. Look at the state of LSUs program before saban was hired and look at what all it has achieved since then. The program was at its lowest point in its history, all the top talent in the state were mostly going elsewhere,
Dinardo took over LSU in December 1994. In 1995, LSU went 7-4-1. In 1996, LSU went 10-2. In 1997, LSU went 9-3 and beat Saban in the Independence Bowl.

Dinardo woke the sleeping giant. He got LSU into the Top Ten in 1997 and 1998.

quote:

Then he comes along and changes everything. He re-established recruiting ties in the state, we won a natty within 4 years.
Dinardo brought in Faulk and a host of players that ended up winning a NC under Saban.

Dinardo had issues, but a big problem he had was that LSU was too fricking cheap to play football at an elite level.

Mark Emmert saw Dinardo's success and the reasons for his failures. He decided it was time for LSU to play big-time football rather than skimping nickels and dimes.

He offered Saban a five-year contract for $1.2 million annually. Only three other coaches in the country were getting paid a million per year: Bowden, Spurrier, and Fulmer.

By contrast, Dinardo's buyout for FOUR contract years was LESS than ONE year of Saban's contract. Dinardo's buyout was $600,000 for the four years of $150,000 salary. Saban's salary was $1.2 million.

LSU (Emmert) decided to to play at an elite level in 1999. Then Emmert hired Saban. Saban did not cause the change to play at an elite level. To the contrary, Saban was a result of that change. He was the coach who received the benefit of that change in direction.

Emmert, Bertman, the Board, and the boosters built the facilities need to play at an elite level.

Saban did NOT lay the foundation for this program to keep being successful. We are NOT a powerhouse program now because of Saban.

The LSU administration changed directions before Saban arrived.

Saban was the beneficiary of that change, NOT the cause of it.

quote:

Growing up in the 90s and watching all those garbage teams, if you would have told me the success lsu would have after the year 2000 I would’ve thought you were nuts.
Emmert, the Board, and the boosters watched Dinardo rebuild LSU recruiting and the LSU program. Where were you? They decided to play big-money football, and open up the budget and pay a coach 8 times more than the previous coach.

Saban was in the right place at the right time. LSU was finally ready to spend. Saban benefitted from it, but he did no cause it.
Posted by jbird7
Central FL
Member since Jul 2020
5606 posts
Posted on 10/28/22 at 10:52 am to
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
60199 posts
Posted on 10/28/22 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

In 1997, LSU went 9-3 and beat Saban in the Independence Bowl.


This is twice you’ve made this specific mistake in this thread. Hard to take the rest of your posts all that seriously when you are coming from such an arrogant “I am right, you are wrong” place. There’s room for nuance. They both raised the national perception of the program.

Btw, it was ‘95 when we beat Saban and Michigan State in the Indy Bowl. It was Notre Dame we beat in ‘97. You want to talk about a ‘97 accomplishment of Dinardo’s that underscores the point you’re trying to make, I’d go with the win over #1 Florida and Faulk being on the cover of Sports Illustrated the next week. But that’s just me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram