Started By
Message

re: Tennessee/Heupel's aggression on offense should be noted

Posted on 10/8/22 at 9:03 pm to
Posted by des4271
Member since Oct 2014
4034 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 9:03 pm to
You can scheme up as aggressive as you want, if JD doesn’t pull the trigger, it doesn’t matter. JD had a chance on the first series to hit Boutte on a post, man on man, with no safety help, Boutte had the guy beat and he didn’t throw it. So for those who are trying to blame it all on Denbrock, that’s not totally true. I do think he could have done a way better job today, but his game plan is limited because of JD’s unwillingness to let the ball go more.
Posted by ellis197575
Atlanta, GA
Member since Aug 2014
1284 posts
Posted on 10/9/22 at 7:09 am to
Agreed. Everybody saying Denbrock is bad but overlooking JD simply isn't pulling the trigger on perceived "tough throws".

If we ran Tennessee offense, we still wouldn't look good bcuz JD doesn't make those same throws Hooker did. JD is a check-down king. Even on 3rd and long, then kid throws it to whoever is closest, even if they're at the LOS. He doesn't throw beyond the marker for 1st downs.

Any offensive scheme looks bad when your QB throws the check-down or holds it and eats a sack constantly.

Man, everybody in America can see JD is struggling to process what he's seeing. He's essentially playing sandlot football.

"Let's snap the ball and then look to see who's open". I'm not even sure he knows the route tree at this point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram