- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The few things Kelly was supposed to bring were structure and organization
Posted on 9/5/22 at 9:19 am to RB10
Posted on 9/5/22 at 9:19 am to RB10
quote:
I’ll repeat myself since you can’t refute it.
LSU is starting division 2 transfers in the secondary.
I can refute this because it's not true.
ULL and McNeese are not D2
quote:
or you can realize this is a transition year that’s going to be used to rebuild the roster.
Coaches have to prove they are adaptable or else they're a bigger concern than talent. Talent can be upgraded, but stubborn coaching is Les Miles shite.
1
Posted on 9/5/22 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I can refute this because it's not true.
ULL and McNeese are not D2
LSU is starting transfers from 2nd rate LA schools in the secondary, but since I said division 2 the point doesn’t stand?
quote:
Coaches have to prove they are adaptable or else they're a bigger concern than talent. Talent can be upgraded, but stubborn coaching is Les Miles shite.
Anyone who’s reasonable knows the roster is in a bad place this year. We will see if that’s addressed over the next two years.
We will see if this staff can overcome the talent deficit with scheme and coaching, but last night didn’t look promising.
ETA: It’s possible to acknowledge that the coaching and game plan were bad AND that the roster is bottom 3 in the SEC. Crazy, I know.
This post was edited on 9/5/22 at 9:32 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News