Started By
Message

re: (OK, so maybe not so) Crazy polifactoid - JFK was only 7 years and change older than

Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:10 pm to
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31671 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:10 pm to
Interesting. Wonder what other generations didn’t get a president.
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12722 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 4:14 pm to
So JFK would be 105 today and some nurses in a retirement home

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89780 posts
Posted on 8/26/22 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

Interesting. Wonder what other generations didn’t get a president.



I was looking at the gaps in the birth order - the largest gaps were 13 to 14 years (Lincoln, February 1809 to both U.S. Grant and Hayes who were both born in 1822; and again from McKinley, December 1843 to Wilson, December 1856), until the ~18 year gaps from Ike (October 1890) to LBJ (August 1908) and Bush 42/Carter (1924) to Biden (1942).

The band narrows tightly with DJT, Bush 44 and Clinton all born the same 9 to 10 week period in 1946 (the Baby Boom was firing up).

Then BHO as the "baby" of the group, a relatively late Boomer, August 1961.

So, if Ike is properly a "Lost Generation" member, LBJ, Reagan, Nixon, Ford, JFK, Bush 42, and Carter are all Greatest/G.I. Generation, then the only real questions are Biden and Generation X.

Biden was born in 1942. I would think the consensus is he is Silent Generation, and every generation prior to Generation X has at least 1 generational representative as President. If the minority view holds and Biden is lumped in with the Boomers, then Silent Generation lives up to their name again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram