- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why is Alec Baldwin responsible for murder?
Posted on 8/21/22 at 12:18 am to BoarEd
Posted on 8/21/22 at 12:18 am to BoarEd
quote:
He and the set armorer both should already be in jail.
Big assumption
There is no reason to have real bullets
Armour is definitely gross negligence - seems like manslaughter
Alex is a douche
2
Posted on 8/21/22 at 12:18 am to thelawnwranglers
His name is Alec. And he is more than a douche. He is guilty of manslaughter.
Posted on 8/21/22 at 8:45 am to thelawnwranglers
quote:
There is no reason to have real bullets
They have blanks in them. These look like real bullets, but without the projectile. They still have the powder so as ti sound like real bullets. The Amorer, is the one responsible for this since the actors haven't been trained to know the difference.
Should they be trained to know the difference? That's a different question. In this scene, Baldwin was shooting a real gun, with a blank in it, directly at the camera (and anything behind the camera). The shot was supposed to show the first-hand view of what the person would see when getting shot.
The question is, why was there live ammo in the gun. That's the aarmorer's job and everyone is supposed to trust the expert. Did the Armorer screw up, or did someone intentionally load live rounds into the gun?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News