Started By
Message

re: How do Creationists reconcile discoveries that date back hundreds of millions of years

Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:06 am to
Posted by SagesSon
Member since Apr 2019
776 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:06 am to
Both are theories. Both have certain points of viability. Creationism explains why we have an earth, solar system, galaxies. Evolution explains survival of the fittest amongst the creatures.

Recently have seen shows that state that new life forms are being created on the ocean floor near fissures where amino acids are present. Makes me wonder if high volcanic/magma activity present during the earlier eras when the earth atmosphere contained high moisture and amino acids gave rise to the various flora and fauna.

Creationism doesn't explain the earth pre-man very well. Evolution still lacks a missing link; that elusive creature between parent and grandchild where a noted change occurs. Change of feather color, loss of digit, mutation from skin to scale, etc.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
10473 posts
Posted on 7/19/22 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Evolution explains survival of the fittest amongst the creatures.
No it doesn't. Those words were never used by Darwin. They were made up by racists bastardizing Darwin for social engineering purposes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram