Started By
Message

re: PAC-10 SOS's;

Posted on 10/21/08 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by MJRuffalo
Huntington Beach
Member since May 2008
6619 posts
Posted on 10/21/08 at 2:43 pm to
It is to point out the truth. To those simpletons that look soley at opponent winning percentage like CBS.com the Pro SEC site adn network. It does require just a little bit of critical thinking so at least half the people here would fall short of understanding.
Posted by silstang23
Bossier City, LA
Member since Oct 2007
4957 posts
Posted on 10/21/08 at 2:55 pm to
If it is TRUE what facts do you have to support that if PAC 10 teams schedule teams like the Big 12, Big 10, and SEC does they would have winning records and be ranked? I'm sorry Portland St., Northern Arizona, UNLV, San Jose St., New Mexico, Colorado St, Idaho, Toledo, Utah St. aren't exactly BCS caliper teams. Pac 10 already plays these teams and I'm not going to mention the Pac 10's record vs the MWC because everyone already knows. MWC is not a BCS conference and when those games were scheduled against the MWC none of them were ranked. Don't act like the Pac 10 doesn't schedule cup cakes. Their already playing them and still can't get more than one team in the Top 25. So what evidence do you have to support the fact that if the Pac 10 starts scheduling pansies AGAIN they would have a better record, be ranked, and be bowl eligible?
This post was edited on 10/21/08 at 2:59 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram