Started By
Message

re: 401k - Putting in more than the company match pros and cons

Posted on 6/28/22 at 11:14 am to
Posted by bod312
Member since Jul 2015
846 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 11:14 am to
quote:

No need to assume "literally zero income other than LTCG." Take this example for feasible use case


Your example is correct and backs up what I said but in much more detail. This is however not what JK said. His post said:

quote:

If you are MFJ you don't pay a dime on the first 81k of LTCG.


That would imply that regardless of any other income stream you pay 0 taxes on your first $81k of LTCG. That is not true if you have other income streams. Your example points to a scenario where you would only get $24k at 0 rate. Realistically if you made $120k of income and then made $10k of LTCG you would owe tax on that $10k (at LTCG rate).

I just think JK's response is misleading and could lead people to make decisions based on the thought that the first $81k of LTCG is always tax free.

quote:

Tell me where this is incorrect or not feasible.


Everything you said is correct to my knowledge but what JK said is not correct except only in a specific scenario.
Posted by TorchtheFlyingTiger
1st coast
Member since Jan 2008
2182 posts
Posted on 6/28/22 at 11:26 am to
Ok, fair enough. Hopefully the real world example makes it clearer for anyone that misunderstood.

Wish I had understood sooner, I may have have squeezed out some LTCG harvesting in low taxable income years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram