- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Michael Peterson vs Scott Peterson - did both of them actually do it?
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:26 pm to Palomitz
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:26 pm to Palomitz
quote:
His change of appearance and intent to flee was just a nervous reaction then
He didn't flee. Have you researched this case at all or just listen to the media bullshite ? He was playing golf with his
dad and brother and the media found him there so he left. The money he had on him was money his sister gave him back for a loan something days prior so he could help pay his lawyers. He dyed his hair to try and avoid media that was literally camped out in his front yard 24/7 for weeks harassing him. This was a huge story and he couldn't take a piss without the media watching.
quote:
What have you guys been watching?
More than you apparently. There isn't one single shred of evidence linking him to her murder. He got convicted by public perception point blank.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 1:30 pm
3
Posted on 6/14/22 at 1:39 pm to WigSplitta22
Detectives in this case, as in most cases, were the absolute drizzling shits. That's what I gather from most true crime documentaries. There was a serial killer in the Seattle area. Police did frick all and couldn't find their own arse with 2 hands and a map. Then when DNA finally popped him decades later, the lead detective had the balls to say to the perp, "Got you motherfricker." Bitch...you got nothing. A computer got him.
In the Scott Peterson case, they zeroed in on him way to early, and moved Heaven and Earth to convict. I honestly believe they found the body (wife and child), and planted it where they knew he was that day...just because they were in too deep and couldn't say "we screwed up trying to hang this guy, while the real killer got away." I'm sure this happens in a lot of cases like this without hard evidence.
In the Scott Peterson case, they zeroed in on him way to early, and moved Heaven and Earth to convict. I honestly believe they found the body (wife and child), and planted it where they knew he was that day...just because they were in too deep and couldn't say "we screwed up trying to hang this guy, while the real killer got away." I'm sure this happens in a lot of cases like this without hard evidence.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:10 pm to WigSplitta22
quote:
There isn't one single shred of evidence linking him to her murder.
So where's the evidence that another person killed her? Is there a forensic evidence left at the house by the assumed murderer? Finger prints, hair, footprints, etc. Where is it? Yep, I'll wait. And OJ is innocent, too.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:14 pm to WigSplitta22
quote:
He didn't flee
That's b/c he couldn't, it was already too late.
quote:
More than you apparently.
So you were a witness? Oh wow. Tell me more how it happened.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News