Started By
Message

re: This is why rankings are biased and suck....qb related

Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:39 pm to
Posted by beardkp
H-Town
Member since Feb 2013
1024 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:39 pm to
why rankings are stupid:

I posted on Social media about how while good (meaning I wasn't saying he actually sucks), if his last name wasn't Manning, he wouldn't be remotely close to the #1 ranked player based on his measurables and high school play/film...

Shannon Terry of all people, replied saying 'but his name is manning'.... LOL case in point jesus.

Had a back and forth for him to say: "The ranking is a projection that he'll be the #1 pick in the NFL draft, meaning with 3-4 years of development, not where he is now" LOL WHAT....if so, then rankings are Completely meaningless then.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 9:19 am
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
14175 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:49 pm to
I think if Arch's last name was Smith he'd be a 4* #120-150 type guy. He's tall, has a pretty good arm, and is more athletic than people give him credit for.

But he's not a Trevor Lawrence type that warrants a #1 overall recruit ranking.

Good player, will likely see some success, he is not his Uncle Peyton.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34522 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

case and point


*Case in point
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram