- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: POLITICO: Supreme Court has voted to overturn abortion rights, draft opinion shows
Posted on 5/2/22 at 9:27 pm to jatilen
Posted on 5/2/22 at 9:27 pm to jatilen
"Abortion Rights"
Give me a break.
Let's call it what it really is: "Killing Babies":
Give me a break.
Let's call it what it really is: "Killing Babies":
quote:
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.
The draft opinion is a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of KILLING BABIES and a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the KILLING BABIES. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito writes.
“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labeled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of KILLING BABIES to the people’s elected representatives.”
Deliberations on controversial cases have in the past been fluid. Justices can and sometimes do change their votes as draft opinions circulate and major decisions can be subject to multiple drafts and vote-trading, sometimes until just days before a decision is unveiled. The court’s holding will not be final until it is published, likely in the next two months.
The immediate impact of the ruling as drafted in February would be to end a half-century guarantee of federal constitutional protection of KILLING BABIES and allow each state to decide whether to restrict or ban KILLING BABIES. It’s unclear if there have been subsequent changes to the draft.
No draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending. The unprecedented revelation is bound to intensify the debate over what was already the most controversial case on the docket this term.
The draft opinion offers an extraordinary window into the justices’ deliberations in one of the most consequential cases before the court in the last five decades. Some court-watchers predicted that the conservative majority would slice away at KILLING BABIES without flatly overturning a 49-year-old precedent. The draft shows that the court is looking to reject Roe’s logic and legal protections for KILLING BABIES.
This post was edited on 5/2/22 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 5/2/22 at 9:34 pm to DownSouthJukin
Pro-lifers are actually just pro-birthers. The majority of abortions are minorities. Most pro-birthers dont give a crap about minorities once they are born. But hey, an added benefit to banning abortions will be many more future Democrats. Yay!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News