- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:59 am to FredBear
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:59 am to FredBear
I understand the push to make judges partisan and political actors based on who appointed them, but it’s really just not that big of a deal. This judge will still be subject to the appellate court’s jurisdiction and will rule based on precedent in that Circuit or be reversed later on.
This post was edited on 3/26/22 at 8:00 am
3
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:14 am to boosiebadazz
quote:Reversal is a wholly different standard. You know that!
This judge will still be subject to the appellate court’s jurisdiction and will rule based on precedent in that Circuit or be reversed later on.
It is obscenely ridiculous to insinuate a party subjected to an original adverse outcome d/t a biased, partisan judge is as fairly treated as one whose proceedings were overseen by a nonpartisan. That is stupid to the point of being sick.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 10:56 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I understand the push to make judges partisan and political actors based on who appointed them, but it’s really just not that big of a deal. This judge will still be subject to the appellate court’s jurisdiction and will rule based on precedent in that Circuit or be reversed later on.
If you truly believe this, that this judge will rule fairly.............wouldnt the fair and honorable thing be for him to recuse HIMSELF for fear of bias? After all, if the case has no merit another judge will rule it so, correct....am I right??????. Makes one wonder if he truly is biased does it not?
Posted on 3/27/22 at 9:41 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I understand the push to make judges partisan and political actors based on who appointed them, but it’s really just not that big of a deal. This judge will still be subject to the appellate court’s jurisdiction and will rule based on precedent in that Circuit or be reversed later on.
This isn’t about the judge being appointed by a generic Democrat or Republican.
This judge was appointed by Bill CLINTON who’s wife, Hillary CLINTON, is a named defendant in this lawsuit.
That is absolutely a conflict of interest.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News