- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman athletes getting less $$$ than male athletes
Posted on 3/11/22 at 5:42 am to SoFla Tideroller
Posted on 3/11/22 at 5:42 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
I said from the beginning this is what will kill NIL.
Naw. This is exactly why the NCAA and its member institutions did backflips when NIL became an avenue b/c it avoided the issues that would come with direct compensation for athletes by the schools. Title 9 would destroy any direct compensation scheme because of what we see in OP.
NIL? Third parties. Colleges can't do this. Why I've argued for 10+ years endorsements were the way to solve the payment issue.
1
Posted on 3/11/22 at 7:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
NIL? Third parties. Colleges can't do this. Why I've argued for 10+ years endorsements were the way to solve the payment issue.
This is true. People can virtue signal all they want but Gordon M can decide who represents his law firm or Canes can still decide who they want in their chicken finger commercials. Honestly they want who would attract the most eyeballs (theoretically) and that’s why the LSU gymnast with the HUGE social media following also got a HUGE NIL deal.
This post was edited on 3/11/22 at 7:30 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News