How, pray-tell, are we going to do that when the federal government constantly attacks and regulates one sector into oblivion, while using taxpayer dollars to prop the other sector up- even thought the technology isnt close to feasible yet?

quote:
However, limiting energy production to just one fuel source leaves one vulnerable to the vagaries of that particular market. If you spread out your fuel sources over several different markets, your energy supply would be more robust, and less volatile, imo.

Tell that to democrats who say, out loud, that they want to kill fossil, while they stonewall nuclear. The right has certainly never espoused this. Another leftist red herring. Most big utilities are all-in on renewables, nuclear, and fossil.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by WildTchoupitoulas

Member since Jan 2010

44071 posts

Posted on 3/9/22 at 11:02 am to Vacherie Saint

quote:
the federal government constantly attacks and regulates one sector into oblivion

I've got a link that says that's not the case:

Vanguard Energy Index Fund

Do you have a link to support your position?

quote:
Tell that to democrats who say, out loud, that they want to kill fossil, while they stonewall nuclear. The right has certainly never espoused this. Another leftist red herring. Most big utilities are all-in on renewables, nuclear, and fossil.

I'm a moderate, I don't subscribe to ideologies. Therefore I'm not really interested in the ideological extremes of the two dominant parties in the US. I believe the path forward lies somewhere in the middle. It pretty much always has.

I support a broad base of energy alternatives from hydrocarbons, solar, nuclear to fusion and alternative energy sources not yet developed. Being monolithically dependent on one source leaves your energy production vulnerable to supplies of that single source.

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board