- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gen. George Patton wanted to wipe out the Soviets after defeating the Germans
Posted on 2/24/22 at 11:20 am to weagle99
Posted on 2/24/22 at 11:20 am to weagle99
quote:
they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms
Patton was wrong about this. We didn't want any part of the Russian army in 1945. And the the logistics heavily favored the Russians.
Posted on 2/24/22 at 11:23 am to Tigris
quote:
Patton was wrong about this. We didn't want any part of the Russian army in 1945. And the the logistics heavily favored the Russians.
We had nukes though...
Posted on 2/24/22 at 1:16 pm to Tigris
quote:
Patton was wrong about this. We didn't want any part of the Russian army in 1945. And the the logistics heavily favored the Russians.
NO logistics but raw manpower favored the Soviets. What they already possessed was American made and supplied and transported.
The US supplied nearly everything to Stalin's Army and AF. Talking about equipment. Fuel. FOOD. etc.
Patton knew this and knew that we could choke off all supplies and win while our military was still smoking hot and ready.
Posted on 2/24/22 at 2:40 pm to Tigris
quote:
Patton was wrong about this. We didn't want any part of the Russian army in 1945. And the the logistics heavily favored the Russians.
No, he wasn't and logistics were horrid for the Red Army. There is a reason the Soviet Army only moved in jumps, with months long stops along the way. They had to stop so they could be resupplied. They did not have the ability to supply their armies efficiently and they were at the end of a very long supply line in Germany.
Posted on 2/24/22 at 3:38 pm to Tigris
Uh,, Nope. They were down to sharing rifles, were starving and depended on what WE supplied them to even still be in the fight. Patton would have smashed them.
Posted on 2/24/22 at 8:53 pm to Tigris
No he really wasn’t wrong about it. The Russians were pretty well expressed by the time they attacked Berlin. After the Germans surrendered we would have not only been able to use what was left of the Wehrmacht supplied by us but we would have had the port of Antwerp to resupply instead of coming from the beachhead. It needed major repairs but could have been done quickly. They had tons of infantry, tanks and artillery as did we but even though they had a capable single engine plane Air Force, we had better planes and most importantly better trained pilots and more of them. The one major difference that would have made it an easy victory though was our fleet of heavy bombers which they did not have. By the end of the war we could routinely put together missions with 1200 bombers completely protected the entire way with P-51’s that would lay waste to whatever was in their path.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News