- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 5/7/24 at 5:30 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
The French could send at most, one to two brigades, which they could sustain for about a month or two
Please explain how you know this. Give specific reasons and data.
Posted on 5/7/24 at 6:21 am to Lima Whiskey
France could easily supply 5,000 - 6,000 troops and far quicker than the USA could get there. That isn't counting SF units. They have been well trained, way more than Ukraine or Russian troops.
This post was edited on 5/7/24 at 6:23 am
Posted on 5/7/24 at 8:04 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
The French could send at most, one to two brigades, which they could sustain for about a month or two.
I highly doubt that French, Polish, or any other western troops would be deployed to the combat area. They would be used to increase and improve the training of Ukrainian troops. Contrary to public opinion Ukraine doesn’t have a shortage of bodies. It has over 9 million military age males to draw troops from. Ukraine’s problem is it has maxed out its training capacity and that is preventing it from being able to come up with enough trained soldiers to replace the ones who 2 year term of military service is expiring.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News