Started By
Message

re: Dr. Naomi Wolf on War Room, “ Pfizer prepping investors for massive lawsuits”

Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:16 am to
Posted by Bearcat90
The Land
Member since Nov 2021
2955 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

quote:
The sole exception to PREP Act immunity is for death or serious physical injury caused by “willful misconduct.”



It’s right there in the document you linked.


So is this:

"Second, PREP Act immunity reaches “all claims for loss” under federal and state law. Loss is broadly
defined to mean “any type of loss,” including (i) death; (ii) physical, mental, or emotional injury, illness,
disability, or condition; (iii) fear of such injury, including medical monitoring costs; and (iv) loss of or
damage to property, including business interruption loss. This language seemingly includes, at a
minimum, most state law tort, medical malpractice, and wrongful death claims arising from the
administration of covered countermeasures."

And this:

"If a claim is within the PREP Act’s scope, a covered person is generally immune from legal liability. The
“sole exception” to immunity is when a covered person proximately causes death or serious physical
injury to another person through willful misconduct. A serious physical injury must be life threatening,
permanently impair a body function, permanently damage a body structure, or require medical
intervention to avoid such permanent impairment or damage. Willful misconduct requires that the covered
person acted (i) intentionally to achieve a wrongful purpose; (ii) knowingly without legal or factual
justification; and (iii) in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable
that the harm will outweigh the benefit."


I'm not arguing for the government, just stating the case. The legal basis will say that the deaths from the jab were outweighed by "that the harm will outweigh the benefit"

And again, I think it's insidious the government did this. But I'll stand firm that Pfizer will never lose any lawsuits.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111802 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 10:19 am to
quote:

But I'll stand firm that Pfizer will never lose any lawsuits.


Right. I would tend to agree with you.

But it’s not that they can’t be sued. It’s that John Doe isn’t likely to win. That’s very different than your first statement.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21962 posts
Posted on 2/10/22 at 11:24 am to
quote:

in disregard of a known or obvious risk that is so great as to make it highly probable
that the harm will outweigh the benefit."


Considering the harm is death, and the benefit is a few months of spotty immune defenses verses a disease with a death rate of 0.2%, that's going to be a hard sell in court.

Moreover, there are different ways to approach a lawsuit. They might have complete immunity for producing and distributing the vaccine, but do they have immunity from lying to the public about the vaccine?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram