- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: See you in Omaha
Posted on 1/23/22 at 9:31 pm to LSUTigahss
Posted on 1/23/22 at 9:31 pm to LSUTigahss
Well I can tell you aren’t a Nutritionist
Posted on 1/23/22 at 10:10 pm to JackaReaux
Nah. More like a Malnutritionist.
Posted on 1/24/22 at 8:54 am to JackaReaux
quote:
Well I can tell you aren’t a Nutritionist
Lol. You must be then.
Unless you’re in a total body recomp position and have a ton of bad weight on you and little good weight (muscle), then dropping a significant amount of fat without muscle loss is very difficult.
I’m betting he wasn’t in that position, as he had likely been working out plenty. So he had + good weight and + bad weight.
To lose that kind of weight requires a caloric deficit. To gain muscle, you need a slight caloric surplus.
To continue to workout while in a caloric deficit can retain some muscle, but at the end of the day to nail that perfect calorie intake to metabolic rate ratio to ONLY burn fat and not any muscle is pretty hard. Obviously top notch nutritionist and training staff could get close, but there’s no way in the world that his muscle mass is the same at 235 as it was at 272.
I would bet my paycheck I know more about this than you. I would love to know what a dexa scan or inbody scan would’ve shown at 272 vs 235. I’m sure body fat % is way down, but muscle mass is as well.
This post was edited on 1/24/22 at 8:55 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)