Started By
Message

re: This idea of sign with school (NIL) to the highest bidder will crash and burn

Posted on 12/30/21 at 10:00 pm to
Posted by AmazinGrace
LSU Fan, Georgetown Alumni
Member since Dec 2013
933 posts
Posted on 12/30/21 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

You are under the impression that the top teams won’t keep paying that elite kid to stay where they are? Uh.....that is already happening.


Let me say this, I’m 100% in favor of NIL.

It’s hard to see schools constantly getting these boosters that help pay these kids only to see them transfer for one reason or another over and over again.

Quinn Ewers is the thought that has come to mind. Supposedly he received over a million dollar NIL deal and stayed half of his freshman year.

He’s reportedly received a huge NIL deal to sign with Texas.

If you gave him his NIL deal at Ohio St. would you be cool with constantly taking chances on 18 yr old kids? I mean if you got that kind of money then I guess it doesn’t matter, but eventually these donors are gonna say hold up.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27336 posts
Posted on 12/30/21 at 10:10 pm to
It’s not sustainable.

99.9 percent of them have no marketable value.

Boosters have limits. It’s a novelty now, but won’t last at this level.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
41083 posts
Posted on 12/30/21 at 10:14 pm to
If you are asking me where exactly I would rather my donation go, then yes I would rather it go to a returning stud. Bama was ahead of the curve there and is why they had so many seniors that would return.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram