- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Why Missouri and the Aggies
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:48 pm
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:48 pm
Since there is no chance of getting Texas, the
SEC should put the full court press on A&M and Missouri since it provides for geographic expansion and brings large TV markets...
SEC should put the full court press on A&M and Missouri since it provides for geographic expansion and brings large TV markets...
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:49 pm to UteTigah
why Missouri? Oklahoma seems to be a far better choice
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:51 pm to baytiger
quote:
why Missouri?
Two big TV markets
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:51 pm to baytiger
He is most likely taking into account that OK is going to Pac???
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:51 pm to baytiger
If we are going to go for a weaker school like Missouri I would rather bring TCU over. Atleast that opens the Texas market more and they would give us better games than Missouri.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:54 pm to SeattleTiger19
quote:
If we are going to go for a weaker school like Missouri I would rather bring TCU over. Atleast that opens the Texas market more
No one in Texas gives a shite about TCU.
Mizzou is a big school with good academics, solid FB and BB teams and a brings alot of TV sets.
The SEC doesn't need to add elite football schools. We have that already.
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:56 pm to Cash
quote:
Two big TV markets
OKC is bigger than either of them
OKC is 100% OU, as opposed to 50/50 KU/Mizzou split in KC and whatever the foothold is in St. Louis between Mizzou and Illinois.
and OU not only has a better football program, but also an overall better athletic program than Mizzou.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:57 pm to haggard79
quote:
He is most likely taking into account that OK is going to Pac???
Mizzou to Big Ten seems like a lot closer to being a done deal than OU going to PacX
and neither is done yet
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 8:58 pm
Posted on 6/10/10 at 8:58 pm to baytiger
I would like to see A&M, Oklahoma and Texas Tech or Ok State either one. Then add Va Tech and move Bama and Auburn to the East.
East
UF
UT
UGA
Va Tech
UK
USCe
Bama
AU
West
TT
OU
A&M
LSU
OM
MSU
UA
Vandy
With this senerio the east will be stronger without a doubt but times change and teams go up and down.
East
UF
UT
UGA
Va Tech
UK
USCe
Bama
AU
West
TT
OU
A&M
LSU
OM
MSU
UA
Vandy
With this senerio the east will be stronger without a doubt but times change and teams go up and down.
Posted on 6/10/10 at 9:02 pm to Cabby
I agree that mizzo is big 10 bound, and frick their tv markets, that school blows
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 6/10/10 at 9:04 pm to Whereisomaha
I'm not so much opposed to the idea of Mizzou in the SEC.. but barring Texas the real prize left in the Big 12 is OU, and if the SEC can get them, they should.
I think the addition of TAMU, OU, Mizzou, and VT would make for a good 16 team SEC..
I think the addition of TAMU, OU, Mizzou, and VT would make for a good 16 team SEC..
Posted on 6/10/10 at 9:09 pm to UteTigah
quote:
SEC should put the full court press on A&M and Missouri since it provides for geographic expansion and brings large TV markets...
Agreed. That brings alot of TV's to the SEC.
Popular
Back to top
2






