- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reluctantly A&M will head to PAC 10 with Texas, in my opinion
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:21 pm to LawDawg1
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:21 pm to LawDawg1
quote:
How would the expense be significantly greater or more expensive for the 6 Big East teams to play TWO away games to the Pac 10 each yeear (one Arizona school and one Pac 8 school)?
If you can explain how it would be cheaper to blend in with the SEC, you win. But you need to explain how it would be so.
Wouldn't they play both Arizona schools every year? And travel to the Western PAC division every other year?
I'd think where travel expenses would add up would be all of the non-football sports. Football is doable with the proposed divisions
0
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:22 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
yep, beacon hill, Rainier and the garfield area are lovely areas
why do you hate people of color?
quote:
I don't think I have ever been to a game where there wasn't some trash around......
Isn't this true of absolutely ANY school and ANY team? Some more than others though....
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:23 pm to LawDawg1
quote:
You think the fans that did show put on its A-game? You think the fans there had any confidence whatsoever to boast about? Had UW gone 12-0 the year before, you think the atmosphere would have been the same? Come on... You should know better than that...
I agree it would have been a little different. Like I said.......I have been to Husky stadium when you were relevant so I don't put you that much higher if you were significantly relevant. Sorry but that is true.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:26 pm to LawDawg1
quote:
why do you hate people of color?
oh wow.....gtfo! Can I not point out the areas you didn't include when you were talking about the seattle area without some dickhead getting overly sensitive? You made it seem like the bad areas are not in seattle. I know for a fact that isn't true.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:28 pm to LSUintheNW
Yet... Garfield is not a bad neighborhood. Merely 5 blocks away is the neighborhood of Mt. Baker and the beautiful homes of Cascadia.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/11/10 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:29 pm to LawDawg1
If the SEC wants A&M to join, just have them fly into Pullman and look around. NOBODY wants to go to Pullman. 
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:38 pm to LawDawg1
I don't know if there is an area called garfield, was referring to the garfield high school area. It may have changed but that area didn't look great to me. I have definately seen much worse as I used to live in New Orleans but it certainly wasn't like the eastside.
Also, as you know Seattle has some areas (just like tacoma) that have pockets. You can be in a very nice neighborhood and not very far away is a pocket of shite. Not including the east side.
eta...yes, from what I remember the area not very far away was very nice. Seattle is a nice city and definately doesn't have the same issues as other cities its size. Not perfect but who can be.
Also, as you know Seattle has some areas (just like tacoma) that have pockets. You can be in a very nice neighborhood and not very far away is a pocket of shite. Not including the east side.
eta...yes, from what I remember the area not very far away was very nice. Seattle is a nice city and definately doesn't have the same issues as other cities its size. Not perfect but who can be.
This post was edited on 6/11/10 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:41 pm to LSUintheNW
[quote]I don't know if there is an area called garfield, was referring to the garfield high school area. quote]
There's not... Garfield is on the cusp of Rainier (which isn't great), Columbia City (which is changing and becoming nice) and Mt. Baker (which is great).
Just giving you crap. Had fun bantering with you.
Looking forward to Pac 16 and to whomever the 16th team will be. A&M? Utah? Hopefully not Baylor...
There's not... Garfield is on the cusp of Rainier (which isn't great), Columbia City (which is changing and becoming nice) and Mt. Baker (which is great).
Just giving you crap. Had fun bantering with you.
Looking forward to Pac 16 and to whomever the 16th team will be. A&M? Utah? Hopefully not Baylor...
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:44 pm to LawDawg1
quote:
There's not... Garfield is on the cusp of Rainier (which isn't great),
you can see how I think that area wasn't very good.......btw, cue the racist remarks!
Posted on 6/11/10 at 5:45 pm to LawDawg1
quote:
Looking forward to Pac 16 and to whomever the 16th team will be. A&M? Utah? Hopefully not Baylor...
cal won't allow baylor in, I think it will be utah if not tamu.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News