- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Call me Burkeian....I'd prefer the SEC as it is
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:02 am to smelvis
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:02 am to smelvis
If the big ten, pac ten, expands and if the ACC expands I doubt it will come at the expense of the SEC. Texas will never join the sec and Mizzou is a better fit for the big ten. You figure the big ten will expand eastward for Rutgers and maybe Syracuse.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:05 am to bayou2003
quote:
You can say the same thing about Vanderbilt.
Eh, not exactly the same. Vanderbilt is a charter member of the SEC with a pretty strong heritage in the conference. And Vandy basketball and baseball are both respectable programs. Arkansas is just a program that's a long way from the core of the SEC. They're not bad people, not a bad program, and they certainly bring a strong AD to the table, but it's Arkansas....who cares.
And adding A & M would be Arkansas - even worse.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:06 am to Smoke Ring
quote:
The Pac 12 deal is bigger than the SEC deal
LINK?
quote:
and the B1G 10 network is bringing in more money this year than the SEC deal.
and another link please
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:34 am to Placebeaux
nevermind I found it
What generates money from college sports?
my answer: Fanbase/Winning
The SEC has the best most loyal fanbase in the country and we DOMINATE college sports.
Even when USC was hot shite they couldn't sell out their own games half the time.
Here is their attendance average. The stadium hold over 100,000 people and they can't fill it and LA is the second largest city in the country
University of Southern California (USC) Football
USC Trojans Website
Location: Los Angeles
Nickname: Trojans
Colors: Cardinal & Gold
Stadium: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum; built 1923; off-campus; grass surface; seats 92,000
Average home game attendance: 87,476 (2007)
First football season: 1888
Conference: Pacific Ten
All-time win, loss, tie record (through 2009 season): 773-307-54
Records differ between the 2006 USC football media guide and 2006 UCLA football media guide. (This may be due to only keeping records for "home" games until the 1950s.) The USC Media guide lists the top five record crowds as:
1. 104,953 — 1947 vs. Notre Dame (Highest attendance for a football game in the Coliseum)
2. 103,303 — 1939 vs. UCLA (USC home game)
3. 103,000 — 1945 vs. UCLA (UCLA home game)
4. 102,548 — 1954 vs. UCLA (UCLA home game)
5. 102,050 — 1947 vs. UCLA (USC home game)
The UCLA Media guide does not list the 1939 game against USC, and only lists attendance for the second game in 1945 for Coliseum attendance records. These are the top three listed UCLA record Coliseum crowds:
1. 102,548 — vs. USC 1954
2. 102,050 — vs. USC 1947
3. 100,333 — vs. USC (second of two meetings, 1945; USC home game)
ALL THE RECORD CROWDS ARE FROM THE 50's AND 40's
What generates money from college sports?
my answer: Fanbase/Winning
The SEC has the best most loyal fanbase in the country and we DOMINATE college sports.
Even when USC was hot shite they couldn't sell out their own games half the time.
Here is their attendance average. The stadium hold over 100,000 people and they can't fill it and LA is the second largest city in the country
University of Southern California (USC) Football
USC Trojans Website
Location: Los Angeles
Nickname: Trojans
Colors: Cardinal & Gold
Stadium: Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum; built 1923; off-campus; grass surface; seats 92,000
Average home game attendance: 87,476 (2007)
First football season: 1888
Conference: Pacific Ten
All-time win, loss, tie record (through 2009 season): 773-307-54
Records differ between the 2006 USC football media guide and 2006 UCLA football media guide. (This may be due to only keeping records for "home" games until the 1950s.) The USC Media guide lists the top five record crowds as:
1. 104,953 — 1947 vs. Notre Dame (Highest attendance for a football game in the Coliseum)
2. 103,303 — 1939 vs. UCLA (USC home game)
3. 103,000 — 1945 vs. UCLA (UCLA home game)
4. 102,548 — 1954 vs. UCLA (UCLA home game)
5. 102,050 — 1947 vs. UCLA (USC home game)
The UCLA Media guide does not list the 1939 game against USC, and only lists attendance for the second game in 1945 for Coliseum attendance records. These are the top three listed UCLA record Coliseum crowds:
1. 102,548 — vs. USC 1954
2. 102,050 — vs. USC 1947
3. 100,333 — vs. USC (second of two meetings, 1945; USC home game)
ALL THE RECORD CROWDS ARE FROM THE 50's AND 40's
Posted on 8/16/11 at 9:53 am to smelvis
quote:
but it's Arkansas....who cares.
I see what you're saying. I think Arkansas is a good SEC school. GREAT fan base. I travel through Arkansas every year to get to Louisiana, been to games at Arkansas when LSU baseball and Basketball played in F'ville. Fan base loves those hogs. Whole State love em. If I ranked their fan base in the SEC it'd go along with LSU, Florida, Georgia, Bama, Tenn. It'd easily be in the Top Half. Those hogs LOVE all sports, not just football and basketball.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 11:18 am to Placebeaux
Posted on 8/16/11 at 11:20 am to Smoke Ring
quote:
Placebeaux, you don't get two links. You get one.
Breakdown of Conference Media Deals ... SEC is #3
Damn Pac 12 $21 million per school.WTF.
ETA: while the Big 12 it says "depends on the school." Now I see why NU and CU left. Mizzou and aTm wanting to leave. Big 12 schools are getting frickED big time.
This post was edited on 8/16/11 at 11:24 am
Posted on 8/16/11 at 1:18 pm to Smoke Ring
I say they lose money on the PAC 12 deal bigtime.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 1:44 pm to Placebeaux
"but it's Arkansas....who cares."
What he really means here is Petrino. UGA fans have had their panties in a wad for 3 years now.
What he really means here is Petrino. UGA fans have had their panties in a wad for 3 years now.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 1:45 pm to Smoke Ring
quote:
You get one.
I notice your link makes mention that when the SEC deal is up, the money will be a flowing.
Wait for it, IMO.
And kill the silliness that is conference expansion now.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 1:55 pm to smelvis
That's a very Georgia/Atlanta centered worldview.
People living in Memphis certainly work with and live around Arkansas alums. LSU people living in and around New Orleans probably rarely encounter Carolina people.
People living in Memphis certainly work with and live around Arkansas alums. LSU people living in and around New Orleans probably rarely encounter Carolina people.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 1:57 pm to wmr
quote:
That's a very Georgia/Atlanta centered worldview.
Meh. I think I've met one or two Arkys in my life. Grew up in Texas FWIW. I think you just run in different circles.
quote:
People living in Memphis certainly work with and live around Arkansas alums.
Okay.
quote:
LSU people living in and around New Orleans probably rarely encounter Carolina people.
I would hope so.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 2:02 pm to Touchdowns4LSU
quote:
A 16 team SEC will mean the death of the greatest league this decade
how so?
quote:
The desire for 16 team conferences is the dream child of the Pac10 and B1G to dilute the SEC.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 2:04 pm to smelvis
quote:
smelvis
a lot of people said the same things you are saying when the SEC added Arkansas and USCe seem to work out just fine.
If the SEC goes to 14-16, we will be playing at most 1 other Conference game, which is the same as the B1g and Pac 16 will be playing, so it won't be any tougher in league play that it is now really.
ETA: I'm not crazy about the idea my self, but the clucker is right, I'd rather be proactive than re active.
This post was edited on 8/16/11 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 8/16/11 at 2:26 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
a lot of people said the same things you are saying when the SEC added Arkansas and USCe seem to work out just fine.
If the SEC goes to 14-16, we will be playing at most 1 other Conference game, which is the same as the B1g and Pac 16 will be playing, so it won't be any tougher in league play that it is now really.
Meh. I think there's greater risk of eventual league insolvency here than with previous expansion. South Carolina was a natural fit, Arkansas isn't all that far fetched (regardless of my thoughts on the matter). But with the addition of more teams, you'll really begin to put a strain on the conference, much moreso than currently exists.
You will begin to draw more and more teams away from natural rivalries/conferences for money, which'll eventually push the boundaries for the viewer/participant market.
As an example, would any of you care as much if LSU played in the PAC 10? Be tougher to hate USC and Oregon because you don't have as much in common with them and they're much further away. That diffusion of the natural culture of college football is what the eventual risk is.
quote:
ETA: I'm not crazy about the idea my self, but the clucker is right, I'd rather be proactive than re active.
I'd rather just remain steady in the boat, pushing this is a zero sum game.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 2:32 pm to smelvis
I agree with you not wanting the Aggies and it diluting the conference.
I just don't agree with Arkansas not being SEC-like
We are regionally a little different than Florida or Georgia, but we are southern. We have more in common overall with the south than we do with Oklahoma or Texas.
Fayetteville just happens to be in the NW corner of Arkansas which makes it a little less accessible to the true south and also happens to be the least "southern" area of Arkansas.
But its still way more southern than anything in Kansas or Missouri.
Maybe we were a stretch, but anything west or north of us is definitely not southeastern.
I just don't agree with Arkansas not being SEC-like
We are regionally a little different than Florida or Georgia, but we are southern. We have more in common overall with the south than we do with Oklahoma or Texas.
Fayetteville just happens to be in the NW corner of Arkansas which makes it a little less accessible to the true south and also happens to be the least "southern" area of Arkansas.
But its still way more southern than anything in Kansas or Missouri.
Maybe we were a stretch, but anything west or north of us is definitely not southeastern.
Posted on 8/16/11 at 2:36 pm to wmr
quote:
I just don't agree with Arkansas not being SEC-like
You people are fine, chill out, I should've rephrased the initial post I suppose. I don't really have any issue with Arky being here. We don't have any rivalry at all with you guys, I know you're building one with LSU, Bama, Auburn; but most of the east looks at you with susupicious eyes. But you're here, so
The meat of the argument is though, that Arkansas is kind of a stretch, as much as you have in common with us.
But A & M?
Posted on 8/16/11 at 2:36 pm to smelvis
I also think some of your feelings towards Arkansas are just due to lack of familiarity as an opponent.
I feel the same way about Georgia. It just seems like we haven't played that much. Georgia, while totally an SEC school, isn't very familiar to me as an Arkansas fan.
Rotations, or whatever, just never allowed us to get to know each other that well.
I feel less towards Georgia than any other SEC school, sans Vandy.
That still speaks to the point about more expansion.
A&M will mean that we play our eastern rivals even less frequently. How long will it take for UGA fans to feel like A&M is a part of the SEC?
20-30 years, if that?
ETA: We initially had Tennessee as annual opponents in football for the first decade after expansion, so we got to know them better.
I think we've still only played Vanderbilt something like 6 times in history in football.
More teams means a less cohesive conference and I agree with you on that.
I feel the same way about Georgia. It just seems like we haven't played that much. Georgia, while totally an SEC school, isn't very familiar to me as an Arkansas fan.
Rotations, or whatever, just never allowed us to get to know each other that well.
I feel less towards Georgia than any other SEC school, sans Vandy.
That still speaks to the point about more expansion.
A&M will mean that we play our eastern rivals even less frequently. How long will it take for UGA fans to feel like A&M is a part of the SEC?
20-30 years, if that?
ETA: We initially had Tennessee as annual opponents in football for the first decade after expansion, so we got to know them better.
I think we've still only played Vanderbilt something like 6 times in history in football.
More teams means a less cohesive conference and I agree with you on that.
This post was edited on 8/16/11 at 2:38 pm
Popular
Back to top


0




