- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:52 am to coldhotwings
Conf USA isn't one of the six automatic qualifier conferences.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:58 am to COTiger
This is what the poster suggested as the new Big 12.
This is not automatic bid worthy.
quote:
Big 12 East
Baylor
Houston
Iowa State
Missouri
Texas Christian
Tulsa
Big 12 West
Air Force
Boise State
Brigham Young
Kansas
Kansas State
Utah
This is not automatic bid worthy.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 9:58 am to coldhotwings
quote:So replace them with UNLV, New Mexico, UTEP, SMU, or just about anybody.
Nowadays, service academies cannot compete day in and day out against BCS calibur schools for the most obvious reasons.
Last four years:
CU/NU/OU/OSU/UT/A&M/TT vs BU/ISU/KU/KSU/Mizz: .724
AFA/BSU/BYU/UH/TCU/Tulsa/Utah vs BU/ISU/KU/KSU/Mizz: 1.000
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:05 am to coldhotwings
I don't think the Big 12 survies. But if they do in that composition, I agree they wouldn't be automatic bid worthy.
Are you in the Navy at Yokohama?
Are you in the Navy at Yokohama?
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:06 am to coldhotwings
quote:Actually, it is.
This is not automatic bid worthy.
My proposed Big 12 in the BCS standings:
2009: 4 TCU, 6 BSU, 14 BYU, 23 Utah
2008: 6 Utah, 9 BSU, 11 TCU, 16 BYU
2007: 6 Missouri, 8 Kansas, 17 BYU, 24 BSU
2006: 8 BSU, 20 BYU
What's the problem? If you say they can't compete with BCS teams, you're basically saying they can't beat Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, and Missouri. Come on.
Current ACC (for comparison) in the BCS standings:
2009: 9 GT, 11 VT, 15 Miami
2008: 14 GT, 19 VT, 24 BC
2007: 3 VT, 14 BC, 15 Clemson, 20 Virginia
2006: 14 WF, 15 VT, 24 BC
My proposed Big 12 is better than the current ACC.
This post was edited on 6/12/10 at 10:14 am
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:12 am to COTiger
quote:
Are you in the Navy at Yokohama?
Yes
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:16 am to coldhotwings
I was at Yokota in the early '70s, probably before you were born.
Probably the best two years I spent in the Air Force. Young, single, and the yen was 360 to the dollar.

Probably the best two years I spent in the Air Force. Young, single, and the yen was 360 to the dollar.

Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:20 am to xiv
quote:
What's the problem? If you say they can't compete with BCS teams, you're basically saying they can't beat Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, and Baylor. Come on.
I'm talking about just Air Force
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:20 am to xiv
Claiming that someone has a "good" program due to their record in Conference USA over the past few years doesnt exactly impress anybody.
Tell you what why dont we run down any of those teams schedules and give them a big 12 south schedule the likes of what we have had to face every season.
@Oklahoma State
Nebraska
Baylor
@Texas
Oklahoma
Texas Tech
@Texas A&M
Missouri
Plus OOC
...any of those teams you listed for the new Big 12 minus MAYBE TCU, you can go ahead and add at least 2-3 losses on each of their resumes a year, and thats probably being very generous. Heck even TCU imo would have at least 2 more losses last season with a schedule like this.
I like your thought process kind of on the new conference alignment, but the fact that the big 12 is going to be in better shape AFTER losing the entire big 12 south and Colorado and Nebraska? Thats just far fetched
Tell you what why dont we run down any of those teams schedules and give them a big 12 south schedule the likes of what we have had to face every season.
@Oklahoma State
Nebraska
Baylor
@Texas
Oklahoma
Texas Tech
@Texas A&M
Missouri
Plus OOC
...any of those teams you listed for the new Big 12 minus MAYBE TCU, you can go ahead and add at least 2-3 losses on each of their resumes a year, and thats probably being very generous. Heck even TCU imo would have at least 2 more losses last season with a schedule like this.
I like your thought process kind of on the new conference alignment, but the fact that the big 12 is going to be in better shape AFTER losing the entire big 12 south and Colorado and Nebraska? Thats just far fetched
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:22 am to COTiger
The Tokyo Metro is great for the single guys. Lots of pretty girls and nice people. I like it here.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:24 am to coldhotwings
The girls probably speak better English than they did 40 years ago. Drink a cold Kirin for me. 

Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:26 am to COTiger
That conference proposal is horrid..
U Houston has a 35k seat stadium..Iowa State....crap..
the MWC Is better than that proposal....
U Houston has a 35k seat stadium..Iowa State....crap..
the MWC Is better than that proposal....
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:27 am to xiv
quote:
My proposed Big 12 in the BCS standings:
2009: 4 TCU, 6 BSU, 14 BYU, 23 Utah
2008: 6 Utah, 9 BSU, 11 TCU, 16 BYU
2007: 6 Missouri, 8 Kansas, 17 BYU, 24 BSU
2006: 8 BSU, 20 BYU
Solid group but nobody up top really that impressive. Virginia Tech would beat the top team in this group 4 out of 5 times. I like VT, UNC, and Miami over your top 3.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:29 am to COTiger
quote:
The girls probably speak better English than they did 40 years ago. Drink a cold Kirin for me
I'm downing a peach chu-hai as I'm typing right now

Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:34 am to coldhotwings
quote:Well they're 0-1 so far.
Virginia Tech would beat the top team in this group 4 out of 5 times.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:34 am to xiv
Not going to happen. Kansas basketball to good for all those teams. And won't be left in a lackluster conference. They will move to the SEC.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:35 am to coldhotwings
I had to Google it. Says shochu is stronger than sake. Must be potent stuff. Sounds good.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:36 am to athletemed
quote:
U Houston has a 35k seat stadium..Iowa State....crap..

On the field, the conference I've proposed has been been better than the current Big 12 over the past four years.
Posted on 6/12/10 at 10:38 am to COTiger
quote:
I had to Google it. Says shochu is stronger than sake.
I seriously doubt this but it does go along with tasty drinks and u know how that goes.
Popular
Back to top
