Started By
Message
locked post

How Head Coaches are hired from other schools 101

Posted on 11/27/07 at 9:07 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96302 posts
Posted on 11/27/07 at 9:07 am
First, because of NCAA rules, the schools cannot directly contact without the whole permission/notification process. So, the trend has been (certainly over the past 5-8 years) to hire private search firms.

In the old days, when a HC vacancy arose, the Athletic Director would make 4 or 5 calls, set up interviews, and make a recommendation to the decision making authority (whether that was a chancellor/BOS, etc.) Then, the trend became search committees, with board members, assistant ADs, possibly former coaches, etc. However, these all ran afoul of the rules. Now, with a privately contracted search firm to gauge "interest", they can skirt the no-contact rules and merely be doing a "survey" whereby the search firm can contact a number of coaches (or coaches reps, most likely) to "hypthetically" talk about several vacancies (including their client school), and just, coincidentally, they are "surveying" the top 5 or 6 coaches on their wish list. They can also use this "survey" to gauge what kind of compensation package, term, etc. that their wish list needs to accept the position.

Months (or sometimes weeks) pass, the school sends a final feeler out, again through the search firm to "confirm" that the "hypothetical" offer is still acceptable (and possibly getting an answer on the timing question), and that nothing has changed - then, when the timing is as optimal (again, the coach will have communicated this back through the search firm) they "announce" the interview, the "offer", and the hiring.

That's why the process appears very confusing to those of us on the outside. The schools do courtesy interviews - it is traditional when a coach is fired (or retires for that matter) to interview one or both coordinators. It is traditional to offer at least one coordinator an offer to remain on staff, things like that. This could only be if they knew who the new head coach was, and who he was likely to want to keep.

To cover the process, the bigger schools now allow a first "interviewee" to get an "offer" that he can reject. It's a formality and it's smoke screen. Rich Rodriquez is an example for the Bama vacancy last year. Currently, Ferentz is the customary "first interviewee" for Michigan.

Posted by LSUgrasshopper
Birmingham, AL
Member since Dec 2006
5282 posts
Posted on 11/27/07 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Rich Rodriquez is an example for the Bama vacancy last year


umm... that was no smoke screen. They offered him a boat load of cash. Bama fans rejoiced as the B'ham news broke the story that he signed the contract and would be the next coach. The he turned them down to stay for less money. Bama was rejected and a national embarrassment. They ponied up 4 mil a year to get Saban out of Miami (who was sure to be fired at the end of this year) in order to save face. How's that working out for them?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96302 posts
Posted on 11/27/07 at 9:15 am to
quote:

They offered him a boat load of cash. Bama fans rejoiced as the B'ham news broke the story that he signed the contract and would be the next coach. The he turned them down to stay for less money. Bama was rejected and a national embarrassment.


That was all done in a misguided effort to save face for WVMD. It didn't work of course, but that was the intent. No offer is made unless the school knows if it's going to be rejected or accepted. They soaked up that one, 1.) To protect this process, and 2.) To give some cover to WVMD.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram