- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Arnett?
Posted on 1/19/21 at 1:02 pm
Posted on 1/19/21 at 1:02 pm
Can we get a detailed analysis on what went wrong with Arnett's interview or what the reasons for not offering him were? Because if it had anything to do with O holding out for Nielson or with Arnett's buyout then it is time to reconsider. I could be completely wrong but there was very little transparency.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 1:03 pm to MSTiger61
Read on pay site not only was his first impression poor, but he failed a white board session portion of the interview.
Badly.
Badly.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 1:04 pm to CatfishJohn
Dang. I appreciate the info. If true then not offering was smart. Just wish it was more transparent, but seems like Texas reported similar things.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 1:04 pm to MSTiger61
Rumor he wore MSU gear to the interview which was just stupid.
Then they said he bombed the interview portion as well.
If any of that is remotely true, then he should be completely off the table.
And there must be a good reason why UT and Oregon said “nah..” as well
Then they said he bombed the interview portion as well.
If any of that is remotely true, then he should be completely off the table.
And there must be a good reason why UT and Oregon said “nah..” as well
Popular
Back to top
2





