Started By
Message

re: USWNT files federal discrimination suit against US Soccer, demand equal pay

Posted on 3/31/16 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Not their fault the men couldn't make it.



You're not understanding him. He's pointing out the difference between the men and women when it comes to the Olympics (the women's team is the national team; the men send an U-23 side with three possible senior players).
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5975 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

this ad revenue you speak of going to include ALL events that both team


I'm referring specifically to revenue paid directly to USSF (not to FIFA for the WC). We can't control what FIFA makes and what FIFA pays to the respetive federations for men's and womens teams - though posts in this thread already make it look proporationaly to already be a higher payment to the women's team than the men's compared to revenue.


I'm assuming this is stuff like the banner borders along the field, etc for the games

Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

'm referring specifically to revenue paid directly to USSF



From Reddit, total revenues in each program's world cup year.

quote:

For FY 2016 from April 2015 through March 2016, which includes the women's World Cup and the victory tour they went on, the USWNT brought in 26.7M.

For FY 2015 from April 2014 through March 2015, which includes the men's World Cup, the USMNT brought in 27.6M.



I'm digging to find a break down of what FIFA paid to USSF. I think it's:

Men's World Cup: $12.9 million
Women's World Cup: $3.2 million


EDIT: Image



This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 2:14 pm
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5975 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:15 pm to
Let me know about the other three years too ;-)

And excuse me if reddit isn't the best source.

Which is the only reason I could support this lawsuit - if USSF isn't giving the women's team the data to run the numbers, then they should be compelled to do so (imo. I have no idea about if they are actually legally compelled).
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

And excuse me if reddit isn't the best source.



Reddit was quoting the USSF report. I edited to add the image compiled from USSF's AGM.
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5975 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:18 pm to
I think the women are already saying that the numbers aren't accurate, so I'm not sure if the reports can be believed or are for other purposes. It could leave revenue out, etc.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 2:20 pm
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

I think the women are already saying that the numbers aren't accurate


Actually, I think they're using those very numbers in the lawsuit, specifically that they out-generated the men by $20 million last year (which is skewed because one team played in a WC, one didn't, and which is why comparing FY15 to FY16 is more fair).

The only numbers they are questioning is how sponsorship and TV money is split, because US Soccer sells those without gender specification.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:22 pm to
Doesn't FIFA mandate a pay out of 3500 for all men's players when they are with their national team? Is that the equal pay the women are referring to?
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Doesn't FIFA mandate a pay out of 3500 for all men's players when they are with their national team? Is that the equal pay the women are referring to?



From the suit, this is what US Soccer pays its players







This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 2:27 pm
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160104 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:29 pm to
Anyone else amused that Hope Solo was equal treatment? If she were a man, she would not have been playing in that last World Cup
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:29 pm to
Can you link me to the report?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Anyone else amused that Hope Solo was equal treatment? If she were a man, she would not have been playing in that last World Cup



Equality can only go one way. They don't want equal.
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

Can you link me to the report?



LINK
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 2:32 pm
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
5975 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 2:37 pm to
So much isn't said - if FIFA paid the US women 2m like they claim for winning it - 75k per person is a great breakdown for that for a 24 man roster.

Germany made over 35m for winnging the men's world cup. Likewise the men's split for winning would be good for that.

The true comparisions need real specific data which USSF should provide - but the public domain will have no access or knowledge of at this point.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24135 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:47 pm to
There are some things in there that are legitimate complaints. The men and women get different per diem rates?

Overall, pay them a percentage of what the teams bring in. Make the percentages the same for the men and women and let the market decide what it is worth.

If I am honest though, I would perfectly OK not paying them anything to play on the national team. Cover their expenses in full but players should be playing for the the (nationalism) and not for the paycheck. The pay should be a nice to have rather than the requirement.

The issue is that the women get paid crap in the professional league and the USWNT is actually a way for them to earn a decent living.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45084 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Overall, pay them a percentage of what the teams bring in. Make the percentages the same for the men and women and let the market decide what it is worth.


I agree with this, but US Soccer doesn't distinguish what each team makes come the end of the fiscal year. They bunch it all up into one figure, probably because the guys typically make 20x what the girls make when they aren't parading around on some WC celebration tour.
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

They bunch it all up into one figure, probably because the guys typically make 20x what the girls make when they aren't parading around on some WC celebration tour.


No. They break revenues down by men and women. Except for TV/sponsorships. Which aren't sold by gender.

And their projections have the women making more this year when neither team has a World Cup. Not exactly 20 times less than the men.

Meanwhile, in each team's respective WC year, the men brought in 27.6 million in revenue. The women 26.7 million.



This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 4:34 pm
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24135 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 5:07 pm to
So pay them more if that's the numbers. This isn't a difficult conversation. If they bring in that kind of market value then pay them.
Posted by Stewie Griffin
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2005
16148 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 5:20 pm to
You bout to get downvoted brah
Posted by fightingtiger2335
heh?
Member since Aug 2007
61157 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

The women 26.7 million.



So with 4 extra games they still didnt beat the men?
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram