- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USWNT files federal discrimination suit against US Soccer, demand equal pay
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:40 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:40 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not to mention you are comparing 30 games for the women to 13 for the men. You are incapable of making a real point. Again, just stop.
So what you're saying is they work twice as much and generate five times the profit, but get paid far less?
Careful. You're turning into a feminist LNCHBOX.
1
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:40 am to Bluefin
quote:
ETA: Are these projections based on going into FY2017, or CY2017? Can't open doc, I'm on mobile.
FY2017.
I'll screen grab and imgur later.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:41 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
So what you're saying is they work twice as much and generate five times the profit, but get paid far less?
The men are mostly playing away which means no revenue and all travel expenses. You're comparing apples to spaceships.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:42 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
So, in 2017, the women will generate (a projected) five times more profit than the men, while getting half the investment in future development.
And it's actually infinite times more since the men are operating at a deficit. Not surprised you can't get any piece of the info right.
This post was edited on 3/31/16 at 11:43 am
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:42 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
Stewie Griffin
If the USMNT played the USWNT, who would win at least 999 times out of 1000? When that changes, the women can get the same pay.
Equal pay for equal work. DWI.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:43 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And it's actual 6 times sine the men are operating at a deficit
Good call.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:46 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
When that changes, the women can get the same pay
Never argued they should get paid the same. Also, if we're arguing pay on head to head results, then why not argue for pay on who has had more international success?
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:46 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
then why not argue for pay on who has had more international success?
Because it's not the same sport.
/thread
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:47 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And it's actually infinite times more since the men are operating at a deficit. Not surprised you can't get any piece of the info right
Nice edit of your own incorrect correction of my incorrect statement.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:47 am to TN Bhoy
quote:
Because it's not the same sport.
Then maybe the same governing body shouldn't be overseeing it.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:48 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
Nice edit of your own incorrect correction of my incorrect statement.
Nice being wrong on everything Mr "I'm not going to even engage this board ........... blah blah blah..... 5 pages later"
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:49 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
Then maybe the same governing body shouldn't be overseeing it.
I agree.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:50 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not to mention you are comparing 30 games for the women to 13 for the men
It's not the fault of the USWNT that they can do a Victory Tour, while the men can't even qualify for the Olympics.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:51 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
It's not the fault of the USWNT that they can do a Victory Tour, while the men can't even qualify for the Olympics.
Another irrelevant point brought to you by the guy that supposedly isn't engaging the board.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:53 am to Stewie Griffin
Textbook case of apples and orange there Stewie.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:54 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Another irrelevant point
It's quite relevant. They win, so they can do a profitable Victory Tour.
The men can't do such a tour.
And WarSlamEagle convinced me to engage. Blame him.
I just don't understand this pent up anger you have about this issue. I disagree with you, but I'm not mad about it.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:56 am to Bluefin
quote:
ETA: Are these projections based on going into FY2017, or CY2017? Can't open doc, I'm on mobile.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 11:57 am to Stewie Griffin
quote:
It's quite relevant
You realize you're only look at event budget, right?
quote:
I just don't understand this pent up anger you have about this issue.
I love posts like these. "I have nothing left, so I'm going to say some random insult that has nothing to do with the discussion."
Posted on 3/31/16 at 12:02 pm to Stewie Griffin
quote:
So, in 2017, the women will generate (a projected) five times more profit than the men, while getting half the investment in future development.
I mean if you have two office buildings and one is literally the nicest one on the block, while the other is shitty and needs repairs to keep up with the surrounding real estate, which would you continue funding to upgrade?
The success of the men's team dictates the success of the women's team. Not vice-versa.
Posted on 3/31/16 at 12:04 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:Dude, you need to get some pussy. ASAP.
LNCHBOX
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News