- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Liberal outrage- guns were very popular gifts this year
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:33 am to TOKEN
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:33 am to TOKEN
quote:
You should be able to buy a gun.
You should also have to register the gun.
Yes those little guns would repel a government takeover
There's an idiot in every bunch.
LC
1
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:34 am to tysonslefthook
quote:
It would have to be because it sure as hell wouldn't be the military.
You mean the military that's been at war for what, 12 years? We have a lot of hands on experience. Or do you honestly believe the military would let you take what they have vested: pay and benefits, retirement, lifetime medical benefits.
You are not just walking up to DC armed in a mob, people will be shooting at you.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:36 am to Lakeboy7
quote:Or do you honestly believe that members of the military will ignore the Constitution and fire on American citizens?
Or do you honestly believe the military would let you take what they have vested: pay and benefits, retirement, lifetime medical benefits.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:39 am to Sevendust912
quote:
There is no reason any civilian should need to own an AR
Feel free to try to come take mine away. Bring friends, I'll wait. Oh, and pack a lunch, cuz it's gonna be a long day.
LC
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:42 am to Jbird
quote:
Or do you honestly believe that members of the military will ignore the Constitution and fire on American citizens?
Exactly
Lakeboy is just denying the obvious
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:44 am to Jbird
quote:
believe that members of the military will ignore the Constitution and fire on American citizens?
I've got pped with violence if its needed.
Jbird you ready to give up the retirement and everything else you have EARNED because a bunch of dipshits don't like the way things are going? Not me.
This post was edited on 2/8/15 at 4:41 am
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:44 am to TOKEN
quote:
f you have to register for a car/ license then how about a gun?
It's amazing to me how so many people in this country are too stupid to understand the difference between a right enumerated in the Constitution and a privilege granted by the state.
LC
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:48 am to Lakeboy7
quote:
I've got 24 years active and reserve, if a bunch of malcontents, and that's what we are talking about really people that have failed in our society, then yes they should be stopped with violence if its needed.
It's people like you that the Founding Fathers rebelled against. You're on the wrong side of this argument, but hey, keep digging that hole if you like.
LC
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:48 am to Lakeboy7
quote:Yes if it means protecting the Constitution. What's the point of having my retirement from the military if the very thing I swore to defend is so easily thrown away for a check, seems to me I might well have been a Merc if I am going to think like that.
Jbird you ready to give up the retirement and everything else you have EARNED because a bunch of dipshits don't like the way things are going? Not me.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:52 am to Jbird
People that want to overthrow the govt, the types are out there for all to see, only give a shite about their version of the constitution.
You don't like something? vote it out, its why we have a political system.
You don't like something? vote it out, its why we have a political system.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 11:55 am to Lakeboy7
quote:Exactly, however some on here are fapping about the potential of using the military against legal law abiding gun owners, I will not follow unlawful orders by any superior, I guess YMMV when it comes to that.
You don't like something? vote it out, its why we have a political system.
This post was edited on 12/27/14 at 11:56 am
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:01 pm to Jbird
quote:
potential of using the military against legal law abiding gun owners
That wont happen and it would be unlawful.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:04 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
That wont happen and it would be unlawful.
It's real easy to play games with terms such as "lawful" and "unlawful".
LC
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:06 pm to Sevendust912
quote:
There is no reason any civilian should need to own an AR
What about an AR makes it so awful a citizen shouldn't own one?
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:06 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
There is no reason any civilian should own a Ferrari.
Exactly. It's so easy to retort against the "nobody needs XXXX gun" argument.
Since when does the government get to decide what free citizens need or want?
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:12 pm to MikeBRLA
It's not called the "bill of needs"
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:13 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:
Jbird you ready to give up the retirement and everything else you have EARNED because a bunch of dipshits don't like the way things are going? Not me.
You are so ignorant and arse backwards that you have no idea what youre talking about. You are void. You stand for nothing. You are soulless. You deface the very doctrine that you swore to protect. Foreign and domestic. Do you know what that means dipshit? Thanks for your service by the way.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:15 pm to LongueCarabine
quote:
Oh, and pack a lunch, cuz it's gonna be a long day
What are you a terrible shot or something?
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:15 pm to MikeBRLA
quote:Should any private citizen have a nuclear weapon?
Since when does the government get to decide what free citizens need or want?
If you say no, you're saying that the government should restrict, to some extent, what weapons people can have. From there, we just need to figure out how much control the government should have.
Posted on 12/27/14 at 12:19 pm to FT
"Arms" refers to small arms. Constitution already limited it.
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News