- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:14 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
You'll have a set of gay 15 year old twins marry each other and their adult aunt and her cat.
that tired old attempt to deflect.
As long as they are consenting adults why do you care.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:15 pm to Revelator
quote:
Gay marriage, Polygamy and then what...
Don't know, don't care so long as they leave me alone.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:17 pm to Revelator
quote:
What about divorce and child custody issues?
Another good example of The Law of Unintended Consequences.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:23 pm to SammyTiger
I'm all for polygamy. 5 wives working while I'm fishing.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:29 pm to Revelator
quote:
Gay marriage, Polygamy and then what...
Freedom? More people minding their own fricking business? Less judgmental douchebaggery? More spirituality and less religious idolatry?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:31 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Freedom
Is your definition of freedom, anarchy?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:31 pm to Revelator
quote:
What about divorce and child custody issues?
just handle it the way we do the guys with several baby mamas.
Adrian Peterson ring a bell?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:34 pm to Revelator
quote:
Is your definition of freedom, anarchy?
Is yours fascism?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:37 pm to Revelator
quote:
Is your definition of freedom, anarchy?
I'm not sure allowing people to define a family as they see fit really defines anarchy. I think the government defining family is definitely a step in the wrong direction.
If everyone believed the things they find unacceptable in society were outlawed we'd have a society in which I really wouldn't want to participate.
Unfortunately we have a lot of folks who believe want to outlaw the things they find distasteful and most social conservatives and most liberals fit into these groups.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:37 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Is yours fascism?
Thanks for the non answer. Having some form of order isn't fascism.
This post was edited on 9/7/14 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:39 pm to Revelator
quote:
Thanks for the no answer. Having some form of order isn't fascism.
No kidding. Thanks for making my point that more personal freedom does not equal anarchy.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:41 pm to Ping Pong
quote:
we don't define marriage, that's the point. I have my own personal definition of marriage, but I don't believe the government should enforce my definition or anyone elses. People should be allowed to define it for themselves. Like I said before, the only regulations the government should have on marriage are laws that protect children from marriage.
so do you want to allow Gays to be married?
if the government shouldn't define marriage than there is no point to push for gay marriage. You should also do away with civilly recognized marriage all together.
If you are going to push for gay marriage you have to redefine the classic definition of marriage.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:42 pm to Ping Pong
Why should anything be illegal? Or let me ask it this way, why should something be illegal?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:44 pm to asurob1
quote:
that tired old attempt to deflect.
As long as they are consenting adults why do you care.
I didn't say I objected to anything. You sound like you're objecting to the notion that a set of gay twins would want to get married to their aunt and her house cat. Who are you to say what's right and wrong for them?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:45 pm to novabill
quote:
Why should anything be illegal? Or let me ask it this way, why should something be illegal?
How else would local police departments pad their coffers if not by confiscating private property used in "crimes"? How else would the CIA fund clandestine operations than by funneling illegal drugs through our boarders? Why else should something be illegal?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:47 pm to Zach
quote:A truly brilliant scheme, assuming of course DSS agents, who already deal with far more sophisticated monogamous sham marriage arrangements, don't spit up their coffee when they see someone marrying 1,000 foreign nationals per week and immediately subpoena the guy's bank accounts and start hauling people in for separate interviews.
Here is just one example of exploitation. A man sets up an international business. He will marry any woman who wants to come to the U.S. on a permanent visa due to spouse.
He charges $1,000 per wife. Marries 1,000 wives per week. Eventually millions from the 3rd world are living here. It's not that hard to do.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:48 pm to Lsut81
Laugh all you want...
People scoffed at Scalia when he said Lawrence would be used as a basis to legalize gay marriage.
People scoffed at Scalia when he said Lawrence would be used as a basis to legalize gay marriage.
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:50 pm to Robin Masters
Ok.why do you think a thing should be illegal?
Posted on 9/7/14 at 1:50 pm to novabill
quote:
Why should anything be illegal? Or let me ask it this way, why should something be illegal?
This is very easy to answer. Something should only ever be illegal if it infringes upon the rights of ANOTHER person. Your rights stop where mine begin and vice versa. So as long as I am not doing anything that infringes upon your rights, I should absolutely be free to do it. Period.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News