- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:25 pm to TheCaterpillar
How are you rocking a 24" inseam at 6'2? I'm 5'10 and comfortably fit in 32x32's.
This post was edited on 2/26/16 at 12:26 pm
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:27 pm to lsupride87
quote:
didnt mean perfect in that way, I should have used a different word. Perfect meant in the middle of the range of healthy standards With BMI, it is easy to point out examples of people that debunk it(any NFL linebacker, any weight lifter etc etc) However, it is very hard to find a healthy person that would not also show healthy with the waist to height ratio. It has very few outliers
Gotcha.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:31 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:We've gone over this before, she's not right.
She's right about it not being healthy.
Just by looking at the plus size chick on the cover, we don't know if she's healthy or not. It's not like she's 400+ pounds and obvious that she's unhealthy.
She could very easily be in very good health at her size.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:33 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:Especially since, and I'm assuming here, the chick on the cover doesn't have a waist over 35 inches.
I don't like that we're talking about full-figured women because it's glamorizing them because your waist should be smaller than 35 [inches]. she is going to catch hell for this
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:34 pm to shel311
quote:
She could very easily be in very good health at her size.
Shes still fat though
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:34 pm to shel311
quote:
She could very easily be in very good health at her size.
She is also only 22. If she carries that weight throughout her life their is a far greater chance of developing health problems than if she was at a lower weight.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:37 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
5'10" with a 38" waist is fat. On what planet is that not fat?
Planet Fitness
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:37 pm to mouton
dammit people, I've enjoyed the physiology lesson and know more about BMI now but can we please get back to bashing fatties and posting pics of fit chicks?
Whats the BMI on these two?
but can we please get back to bashing fatties and posting pics of fit chicks? Whats the BMI on these two?
This post was edited on 2/26/16 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:39 pm to mouton
There is a guy that uses the same primary physician I do, he is 360 lbs. 52 years old. No diabetes. No high blood pressure. No high cholesterol. No health issues at all. My primary physician is 44 and weighs 170. High blood pressure and high cholesterol. It's genetics.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:40 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:More hyperbole!!!!!
At 6'2" the "perfect" waist would be 37" That would be incredibly fat
"incredibly" fat.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 12:45 pm to More beer please
quote:Ok, not what I was talking about but ok.
Shes still fat though
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:09 pm to shel311
People with 37" waists weigh like 300 lbs bro
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:10 pm to Upperdecker
quote:
That link says I could blow up to a 37" waist and still be "healthy".
Their definition of "waist" is circumference 1" above the navel. That's not where men's pants fit, baw.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:11 pm to el Gaucho
My waist is 38" and I'm only 270
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:11 pm to PatDyesPants
Frick Cheryl Tiegs in her arse.
Ole thick girl on the SI cover can get the whole 9.
Ole thick girl on the SI cover can get the whole 9.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:11 pm to mouton
quote:
She is also only 22. If she carries that weight throughout her life their is a far greater chance of developing health problems than if she was at a lower weight.
It's not often I agree with Mouton, but when I do, it is usually emphatic agreement.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:16 pm to Iron Lion
Well, that might be the case after 52 years but you just wait and see how it is in 20 more years. At around age 70, your fat buddy will be more unhealthy than his skinny Doctor.
Genetics has as much if not more to do with health issues than anything. This coming from a fit man of 46 who has had Stage IV Lymphoma twice in 5 years. Comes from my moms side. Her dad, her brother, her sister and she all died of some sort of cancer. Her only surviving sister has Breast Cancer now but is in remission. My uncle died 22 years ago from the same sub type of Lymphoma I had.
Genetics has as much if not more to do with health issues than anything. This coming from a fit man of 46 who has had Stage IV Lymphoma twice in 5 years. Comes from my moms side. Her dad, her brother, her sister and she all died of some sort of cancer. Her only surviving sister has Breast Cancer now but is in remission. My uncle died 22 years ago from the same sub type of Lymphoma I had.
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:21 pm to soccerfüt
quote:
She caused a Sperm Holocaust with this cover.
Yes she DID,,,,,
Posted on 2/26/16 at 1:37 pm to shel311
quote:
quote:
At 6'2" the "perfect" waist would be 37" That would be incredibly fat
More hyperbole!!!!!
"incredibly" fat.
No it's hyperbole to people who have a fricked up idea of what fat is. If my waist was 37" I'd be incredibly fat.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News