Started By
Message

re: Answers in Genesis presents: Noahland

Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:25 pm to
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:25 pm to
You're right, he was an angel. And the highest ranked angel in heaven.

God didn't create Satan himself, but created him as lucifer. He allowed the possibility of sin and just like I said earlier, wasn't going to force anybody or anything to follow him. You had to accept him as lord and savior. Satan didn't do that, he rebelled against God. So God cast him out of heaven and into the earth. While God cannot sin himself, he didn't take those sins away because he cannot be around sin either. Heaven (to Christians) is the perfect place with no sin.

I'm not going to pretend like I have all the answers on this subject. I just try to follow his word as best I can.
This post was edited on 6/26/16 at 2:33 pm
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46572 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:28 pm to
Literal interpretations of the Bible require one to explain why God created malaria, parasitic worms, etc.
Posted by shiftworker
LP
Member since Dec 2011
5104 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

I don't understand before CHRIST. So, he is the way the truth and the life and no one comes to the father but him. So, did he send everyone to hell before CHRIST died?


We are saved looking back to the death and resurrection on Jesus. Those before His time were saved looking forward.

quote:

So, if God is love, and being kind is a characteristic of love as defined by the NIV verse in Corinthians, why would he send his son to die an allegedly excruciating death when there was obviously some standard set before Christ?


The sacrifice of animals was a temporary sacrifice. You needed to continue to sacrifice animals to cover your sins. The sacrifice of Jesus is forever. The only single sacrifice that was enough to cover all of man kinds sins for the duration was that of His son.

Salvation is a gift that we can not earn through our human actions. We can accept it only, or not accept it, but never can we earn it. And as such we also can not lose it through human actions.


I won't pretend to have all the answers. These are my beliefs. Anyone on either side of this discussion who does claim to know all the answers is a fool.

I like your questioning attitude. I am one of those believers who doesn't think having questions is a bad thing. Your questions aren't disrespectful.
Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:31 pm to
Because it's a fallen world, allegedly. I follow the argument until it arrives at the doorstep of a "loving" God.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46572 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:34 pm to
But that's the thing: A fallen world can't explain it if you reject evolution.

If evolution isn't real, the only way malaria can exist is if God actively created Plasmodium, a set of organisms which only exist as a disease causing parasitic Protozoa. They didn't evolve from doe thing benign, they were created by God directly.

Why?
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Yeah fricking right.


Why didnt Jesus,the all knowing God, in all his sermons and teaching not tell people to simply wash their while handling food or after using the bathroom...

How many millions of kids wouldnt have died from that simple revelation about germs, something he supposedly created and let loose upon the world?
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:37 pm to
For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ our lord.

So, tell me, what's the worst thing you have ever done? If God isn't a loving God, your worst sin would kill you right? If he was such a spiteful God like you say, you'd be dead right now.

But like I said before, I don't claim to have all the answers and know how and why God does the things he does. All I can do is try and live right by him.
This post was edited on 6/26/16 at 2:42 pm
Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:45 pm to
I guess as a punishment for sin because death entered the world at the fall of man.

I don't understand it in light of the following verses: LINK

JESUS claims a man born blind was to glorify the father. It also specifically states that sin wasn't the result of the congenital condition.

Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:48 pm to
If you're asking me am I a sinner under the biblical definition of sin, I am. Everyone sans JESUS is.

But, by that logic, everyone would be dead because of sin because all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. And all sin is equal in the eyes of God.
Posted by NoBoBullDog
Member since Aug 2011
1533 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:49 pm to
Man, I'm blown away by your.....intelligence! It's just too much smart
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
114063 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:56 pm to
What I don't understand is.. How the frick did he save the animals that he didn't know existed? There were animals in North America, etc, etc,etc that didn't exist in Noah's part of the world, yet he was about to get two animals, one of each sex, on his boat. And how did they keep the lions and tigers and bears oh my from eating other animals? Did he have the appropriate food for all the animals?

If god could make all of this happen, you telling me he couldn't just make people good instead of wiping out everyone?

Just for the record, I am not atheist, however; I believe in a higher being, but not in the way Christians believe. I was born and raised Catholic, attended Catholic school for several years. Maybe there is something to it, but god used Noah to wipe out all living things on the face of the Earth with the exception of what Noah had on his ark right? How would that have changed the fact that Eve ate the apple, at which point made people sinners? By repopulating the world, wasn't it inevitable that people were going to remain sinners, etc?

Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46572 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 2:57 pm to
It takes very minimal intelligence to understand the problems with a literal Biblical flood.
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46572 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

What I don't understand is.. How the frick did he save the animals that he didn't know existed? There were animals in North America, etc, etc,etc that didn't exist in Noah's part of the world, yet he was about to get two animals, one of each sex, on his boat. And how did they keep the lions and tigers and bears oh my from eating other animals? Did he have the appropriate food for all the animals?

If god could make all of this happen, you telling me he couldn't just make people good instead of wiping out everyone?

Just for the record, I am not atheist, however; I believe in a higher being, but not in the way Christians believe. I was born and raised Catholic, attended Catholic school for several years. Maybe there is something to it, but god used Noah to wipe out all living things on the face of the Earth with the exception of what Noah had on his ark right? How would that have changed the fact that Eve ate the apple, at which point made people sinners? By repopulating the world, wasn't it inevitable that people were going to remain sinners, etc?



The crazy thing is I see kids ask these questions ALL THE TIME when presented with this story. Six year olds with looks of "Ummm..." on their faces wondering how the frick to overcome all the common sense issues running through their head. It's wh y'all these fundamental evangelical groups put out literature on how to deflect these questions, because indoctrinated adults are constantly getting outfoxed by first graders in Sunday School.

In my experience it takes years of indoctrination before you arrive at adults who no longer question it.
This post was edited on 6/26/16 at 3:03 pm
Posted by HeadChange
Abort gay babies
Member since May 2009
43837 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 3:12 pm to
I'm with you man. No one has seriously answered what the animals ate when they got off the Ark. Herbivores should've been fricked because their food source was toast and the carnivores probably had their shot at them too.

But I guess you can't seriously answer that question if you literally believe that story, because rational and critical thinking had already been tossed out.
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

shiftworker
Do you need a safe place? Are you triggered around all these differing opinions? I'll pray for you.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
114063 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

In my experience it takes years of indoctrination before you arrive at adults who no longer question it.





There are people who just accept it because its in the bible. Its almost as if they think its wrong to even question these things. This was years ago, but I was having a drink with some friends and the girls in the group somehow started talking about the bible. I started to ask them questions similar to the ones I asked about Noah and one of them got mad and told me "you are thinking too much into this. Whatever the bible says is all we need to know". These were people with college degrees, have good jobs, etc (I am just saying it wasn't as if I was talking to the uneducated.. And not that having a college degree means people should have a certain view on religion).

One set of my grandparents were "die-hard" Catholics. They didn't miss Sunday Mass for anything. My grandpa was a wise man, fought in WWII, worked a job as well as ran a AC company on the side, but when it came to his religion it was as if he lost a certain sense that he applied to his non-religion life. There are a lot of people like this, I was just using them as an example, but when you do not allow yourself to question something it makes you vulnerable.

The bible was written when? 700+ years after Jesus reportedly died? Then it has been translated, I am not 100% sure but the original language it was written in doesn't even exist anymore. What about the scriptures that were decided not to be included in the bible? There is just too much to question, yet many people expects everyone to just "roll with it".
Posted by NoBoBullDog
Member since Aug 2011
1533 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

It takes very minimal intelligence to understand the problems with a literal Biblical flood.

Man I'm in awe of such a wizard o smart like you! Sounds like you got it all figured out...
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6049 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 6:13 pm to
Yet another who has added zilch to this conversation.
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20362 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 7:55 pm to
I'm not saying all Christians go to heaven and I'm not saying Jews and Muslims go to hell. All I'm saying is that it's a gamble to just go ahead and refuse to believe in God.
Posted by Filtiger
Philippines
Member since Apr 2009
352 posts
Posted on 6/26/16 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

I haven't read the whole thread and probably won't, but why do people think Christians (and some do apparently) believe the earth is only 6-7k years old?



Because religious fundamentalist believe the Earth was created in literally seven days. Most are well intentioned, but they have no clue. If they truly did some research they might actually begin to understand and not turn so many away because of their illogical and extreme views.
This post was edited on 6/26/16 at 9:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram