Started By
Message

re: LeBron's stalker Windhorst is reporting Bron and Gilbert feuding over financials

Posted on 1/26/17 at 5:59 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

They've spent substantially more and will be getting hammered with luxury tax if they spend more. I read they're close to it going up $3.25/1 going forward. Fringe players won't make much of a difference anyway when rotations are shortened in the playoffs.

So again, Gilbert promises Lebron he'd spend unconditionally. He did not.

Sure, rotations shorten up but you're missing one other piece. Now they're a little thin which has caused Lebron to be league leader in minutes played in part because Gilbert didn't spend unconditionally, something he allegedly promised Lebron he'd do.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
22678 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 6:03 pm to
I think Lebron had some sense of what they'd spend when he tweeted bye to Delly and congrats on the money right as the news of the Bucks offer broke.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47599 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

They've spent substantially more and will be getting hammered with luxury tax if they spend more. I read they're close to it going up $3.25/1 going forward.
let's look at all the teams that lost bc they were afraid of the tax..
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70884 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

shel311



It's kind of shocking to me that you don't fully grasp how the NBA salary works... there is no such thing as "spending unconditionally" i.e. you can't be over the cap and just be like "well we're going to sign this guy and take the lux tax hit."
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

It's kind of shocking to me that you don't fully grasp how the NBA salary works


quote:

there is no such thing as "spending unconditionally" i.e. you can't be over the cap and just be like "well we're going to sign this guy and take the lux tax hit."



No kidding.


You may wanna reread my posts in this thread.
This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 10:32 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145156 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

It is but if it's true that Gilbert promised Lebron that he'd spend unconditionally, then Lebron probably has a legit beef, even if Cleveland has spent more than any other team.
cmon now. Yes, Cleveland isn't technically spending money "unconditionally" but there's no way that Cleveland should be held to that standard because that is so beyond unreasonable. Cleveland literally has the highest salary in the history of the league. If LeBron is actually getting upset that they aren't technically spending unconditionally even when they have this historic level of team salary then I don't know what to tell him
This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 10:40 pm
Posted by Sauce Castieaux
Asheville, NC.
Member since Nov 2015
5031 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

let's look at all the teams that lost bc they were afraid of the tax..


Brooklyn spent like 197 million at one point. Sure worked out for them to spend money "unconditionally"

This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 11:15 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70884 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

You may wanna reread my posts in this thread.



I did, you kept mentioning how Lebron got burned because Gilbert said he would "spend unconditionally".

If that was said, Gilbert is an idiot for straight up lying to him and if Lebron believed that could actually happen when he has been in the league for as long as he has been, then he is just as much an idiot.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145156 posts
Posted on 1/26/17 at 11:38 pm to
i honestly dont even see how lebron could be upset at the spending right now. there is nothing that cleveland can do in regards to spending more. there would be no free agent they could sign that would realistically help the team. and even if there was, unless they stil have some of their MLE left, they could only sign said free agent to the veteran minimum
This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 11:40 pm
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13709 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 2:39 am to
They're capped out. LeBron dug This "hole" (they won the title last season and are a shoe in for it this year, are they really struggling?) they're in.
Posted by stevo1905
Member since Nov 2010
2082 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 5:28 am to
quote:


you think they won because of Thompson.
Lets at least attempt to be serious.
Thompson was a major contributor on that team. He's one of the best offensive rebounders in the league and worked his arse off in that GS series.

$81 million is a lot of money, but that's his worth under the new cap and they absolutely needed him last season. The Cavs went through a similar stretch around a year ago and likely will be fine once Smith comes back.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 6:28 am to
quote:

but there's no way that Cleveland should be held to that standard
Then Gilbert shouldn't have allegedly promised to do just that, correct?

quote:

Cleveland literally has the highest salary in the history of the league. 
That's a clever little math trick largely based on the booming salary cap. Could be wrong but I'm guessing if you look at that top 5 or 10 all time, it's literally with teams from this season?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 6:29 am to
quote:

If that was said, Gilbert is an idiot for straight up lying to him and if Lebron believed that could actually happen when he has been in the league for as long as he has been, then he is just as much an idiot.
feed, you still don't understand. No one is thinking Gilbert should just go out and add $50mil to the payroll right now.

Still not sure what you're missing here.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 6:33 am to
quote:

there is nothing that cleveland can do in regards to spending more
I thought that too, until I read the espn article. There are ways they can add salary. It would mostly be taxed at a crazy $3.25/1 rate, but again, if Gilbert promised unconditional spending, the tax should never factor into his decision.


And as I mentioned before, it may also stem from Cleveland not matching on Mozgov or more likely Delly. I'm certainly not a Delly fan but we know lebron loves the guy, and he'd actually help out on this team at the very least to be able to reduce Lebron's League leading minutes played.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70884 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 9:20 am to
So what quantifies as "spending unconditionally" since that's the trope you are clinging to?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 9:34 am to
quote:

So what quantifies as "spending unconditionally" since that's the trope you are clinging to?
You're acting like I just randomly used the term because I wanted to.

It really seems like you don't realize it comes from the article, it's a pretty good guess at this point that you didn't bother to read the article.

And to answer your question, you wouldn't quantify it, it would be spending without conditions or limits. It's really not that tough to comprehend.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66928 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 10:18 am to
One thing I'd be willing to bet on is that Dan Gilbert will frick this up.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47599 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Lebron's League leading minutes played.




this

dude shouldn't have to go 44 minutes in mid-January in New Orleans. that adds up by the time you get to late May and into June
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145156 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:


Then Gilbert shouldn't have allegedly promised to do just that, correct?
maybe Lebron shouldn't be holding gilbert to his exact wording and should look around and see that Cleveland has pretty much spent unconditionally?
quote:

That's a clever little math trick largely based on the booming salary cap
so? Your point is?
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10826 posts
Posted on 1/27/17 at 11:08 am to
quote:

there is no such thing as "spending unconditionally"
quote:

it would be spending without conditions or limits.
So there's no such thing in reality but Gilbert should still be doing it.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram