Started By
Message

Common misconception about the 2013 lsu offense

Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:26 am
Posted by BigEdLSU
All around the south
Member since Sep 2010
20268 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:26 am
I keep reading about how Les will open up the offense when he gets elite talent, similar to 2013. I just wanted to refresh your memories. The offense did our players no favors that season. Odell and Jarvis were regularly running 1 and 2 man route combinations where they would both be bracketed. Mett was able to hit perfect back shoulder fades, and you had two all pro (maybe even hall of fame) receivers.

Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11165 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:28 am to
Yep. And Mett to Landry on 3rd and medium was pretty near automatic to keep a lot of drives alive.
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
12391 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:30 am to
He can't wait until we have two all pro receivers, a top 10 nfl running back, and an nfl starting quarterback to finally decide to throw more than a hitch or a slant.
Posted by TigerinSC
SOUTH CAROLINA
Member since Aug 2010
1746 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:31 am to
The offense in '13 was not very different than what we have today. Yes we threw across the middle of the field more but we had an NFL caliber QB to make those throws. Still a lot of gos and streaks, very little screen, and TE involvement. We just didn't care because of the two studs on the outside making plays.
Posted by BigEdLSU
All around the south
Member since Sep 2010
20268 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:34 am to
Our receivers do so well in the league because its easier for them to get open in the NFL. They aren't double or triple teamed anymore.
Posted by man117
Los Angeles
Member since Jul 2009
674 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:35 am to
That offense was great until Georgia, I felt like we reigned it in after that shootout.
Posted by jyoung1
Lafayette
Member since May 2010
2123 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:36 am to
quote:

hitch or a slant.

I wish we threw more of these.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64719 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:38 am to
our offense is effective with good execution; however, it takes elite players like mett, obj, jarvis, and hill to execute the offense
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83583 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:42 am to
the only thing that opened up in 2013 was the middle of the field

other than that, the offense was the same as it was this year, just ran more effectively
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64719 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:43 am to
quote:

That offense was great until Georgia, I felt like we reigned it in after that shootout.

eh, we scored 59 points the very next week against Miss State and had a great game offensively against A&M as well. Arkansas, if you'll remember, was played largely without Beckham. We also ran for 273 yards on them.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22184 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:46 am to
So, the common misconception is that LSU's talent was so good that the LSU offense wasn't as good as perceived? Is your point really that the LSU offense was only good because of talent and execution?
Posted by Kracka
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2004
40810 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:48 am to
quote:

(maybe even hall of fame) receivers.


Lets not get ahead of ourselves.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162231 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Mett was able to hit perfect back shoulder fades, and you had two all pro (maybe even hall of fame) receivers.

Landry has about a 0% chance of being a HOF receiver

Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:55 am to
OK, sooooo. . . Better talent + better execution = better offense.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Landry has about a 0% chance of being a HOF receiver



He's got much better stats than Hines Ward at this point and their games remind me a lot of each other.

If Landry puts up these stats for 15 years he'd be in the HoF.

Obviously that is very tough to do. He has the game and toughness that will lend itself to a long career though. Great blocker, GREAT hands, great leader, etc.

Posted by RATeamWannabe
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
25948 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:57 am to
Still ranked what, 7th in the SEC in offense that year?
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66948 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Yep. And Mett to Landry on 3rd and medium was pretty near automatic to keep a lot of drives alive.



The 3rd down conversion numbers were crazy IIRC
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25484 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:57 am to
I agree 100%. Considering we had an NFL caliber QB, 2 all pro WR's and a NFL starting RB we still ran the same offense.
Posted by km
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5653 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 8:58 am to
Under-utilized players, as usual.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 12/7/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The 3rd down conversion numbers were crazy IIRC



#1 in the country and the highest in LSU history.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram