jrodLSUke

[quote]Bill Clinton made us weak and is directly responsible for 9/11. There's no way in hell we weren't going to war after the first plane hit.[/quote] Clinton does not get enough criticism for his weak response to terrorist attracts on the US. He did nothing in response to attacks on the WTC, USS...

Pre 911, the US was being attacked repeatedly by terrorist. 1st World Trade Center bombing, US Embassy bombings, USS Cole bombing, 2nd WTC bombing, and others. Post 911, the terrorist networks and the regimes that supported them were either wiped out (Afghanistan) or they were doing everything p...

Universal Healthcare and wide open borders. Sounds like a perfect combination for California taxpayers. ...

[quote]But aren't the charges misdemeanors unless they prove that he falsified records in order to commit a crime?[/quote] The falsified records would be the misdemeanor, based on state law. Then Braggs has to prove this was done violated campaign finance law, which is a felony. ...

[quote]Can someone post a map of St. George?[/quote] [img]https://preview.redd.it/lhid73a3db971.jpg?auto=webp&s=1085531153898ee0e843c56532b8c0c321ed62fc[/img]...

[quote]Even if the jury finds that this behavior violates the wacky business records law, they have to rely on a second statute with a longer SOL, which requires the campaign association.[/quote] Ok, I think I'm starting to get it. [quote]"Mr. Trump’s lawyers argued that the New York statute re...

[quote]SCOTUS sends the case back down to Chutkan and forces her to have an evidentiary hearing and force her to make a determination between official and private acts.[/quote] That seems to be the expert's opinion on this. IMO I don't think SCOTUS will leave this that open ended. They will giv...

[quote]immunity for many of their public acts. Their private acts must meet legal muster. Hence, limited immunity. I don't understand why this is so difficult to understand.[/quote] That part is not difficult. The issue is who gets to decide when an act can be labeled as private and outside preside...

[quote]Means the Special Counsel didn't say anything (nor did a Justice ask a question) they felt warranted any additional argument. Sends a message.[/quote] Trump’s team must have also been pretty happy with the challenges SCOTUS leveled at the prosecution. They we’re winning and didn’t need a re...

More evidence that people will vote against their best interests. Happens all the time, especially on the Left. ...