jamdiggity12

miss st? vandy? ole miss?

to be honest half the crap on here is unnecessary and pointless.

he is and I agree. the dude is a physical specimen. and having him back is better than not having him at all for sure. no argument there. I was never trying to start an argument with anyone. this is supposed to be a fan site and all im trying to do is shine my beacon of light on the team I love and share my fandom with other fans not argue and put down people that are supposed to be on my side.

quote:

---

no but your post makes you stupid

---

if hill is at practice today and is in fact back on the team that's great. but to act like not having him would be the end of the world for this season is stupid if you ask me

I agree we were probably better but that's not the point of the statement the point being is lsu in the last 10 years doesn't rebuild they usually just reload

for the last 10 years LSU has had a stable of running backs fully capable of becoming a starter. when toefield went out Dominick davis came in during the sugar bowl against illinios and dominated. Not having Jeremy hill would not be the end of the world because we will have another running back or two step up and make the plays that we need like Alfred blue and Kenny hilliard, both of which have proved themselves to be formidable.

im a huge royals fan and there are now two wild card spots all we need is one and we are only like 4-5 games back and that is with something like 57 games left

the all caps was an accident

ACTUALLY THE CHIEFS HAVE JAMMAAL CHARLES WHO IS A TOP 5 RUNNINGBACK IN THE NFL SO HE DOES HAVE OTHER WEAPONS TO TAKE THE FOCUS OFF. HE JUST HAD A REALLY CRAPPY QUARTERBACK WHO CANT THROW BUT WITH SMITH THERE NOW HE WILL HAVE A MUCH BETTER YEAR

:geauxtigers: i dont hear any jacoby haters anymore dude is raw