- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 105 |
| Registered on: | 8/25/2011 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Patriots (7-2) at Panthers (6-3), Huge Game for Saints - Predictions?
Posted by chwsch on 11/18/13 at 11:45 am to LasVegasBandit
Panther's defense is obviously exceptional, but NE has been playing good defense too. Meanwhile, New England is also one of the better offenses in the league while Carolina not as good. I'll take Tom Brady to make the difference in this game.
0
I hope it works out that way. SF has a pretty good defense, but they didn't force the turnovers in this game, they were our own stupid mistakes. If we play a clean game against them in the dome, it's a blowout.
re: Les responds to Landon Collins...
Posted by chwsch on 10/31/13 at 10:32 am to RealityTiger
Landon's own mother literally said "LSU #1 Geaux Tigers" on national television right after he announced he was going to Alabama, and the guy is saying that LSU threw him in the dirt? LSU has no connection to him at all, and that's by his own choice, so how does LSU even have the power to throw him in the dirt? His own momma did throw him in the dirt, so maybe he should talk about that with his therapist rather than talking shite about the school that would gladly have taken him if he'd wanted it.
re: Which would you prefer? (BCS or Bama)
Posted by chwsch on 10/21/13 at 4:51 pm to SnowTigrrr
I don't really care about the distinction between BCS bowls and non-BCS bowls. Winning the Sugar Bowl used to be the capstone of an SEC championship season, but sneaking into the Sugar Bowl becaue the champs are playing in the NCG is hollow. If we don't win the SEC championship, then the only thing I care about bowl wise is getting a good matchup, which might be more likely to happen in a non-BCS bowl if the shitty BCS bowls of recent years are any indication.
So, the choice is obvious. Beat Alabama. Choosing to lose a regular season game in order to sneak into a better bowl would be weak anyway, no matter who it is.
So, the choice is obvious. Beat Alabama. Choosing to lose a regular season game in order to sneak into a better bowl would be weak anyway, no matter who it is.
re: Les just admitted he sat Hill because of the fumble.
Posted by chwsch on 10/21/13 at 2:28 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
The 3 INTs didnt hurt in the sense that it led to Ole Miss points. all it did was potentially take points off the board for us. So yeah the O struggled. The INTs were no different than 3 punts and the O did enough to get us back in the game.
One of the ints came in the red zone which is an easy 3 points off the board for us. One was from about the 35 which is a long field goal, but still a very possible 3 points especially if we had gotten just a few more yards. One of the ints came on the first play of an offensive drive meaning our defense got less than even a 3 and out before having to back to work and Ole Miss took advantage with a long scoring drive. All the picks are responsible for allowing Ole Miss to win the time of possession battle in the first half.
The offense didn't get us back in the game. The defense kept us in the game by holding a talented Ole Miss offense to 10 points in the 1st half even though we gave up 3 easy turnovers.
Stop whenever you want, someone else will pick them up immediately.
re: Les just admitted he sat Hill because of the fumble.
Posted by chwsch on 10/21/13 at 1:57 pm to Hat Tricks
quote:
And putting in a true freshman who has thrown, what, 2 passes?
I'm clearly not suggesting we actually bench Mett, just saying that only giving Hill 7 carries in the first half was just as dumb. Mett is clearly our best QB, and Hill is clearly our best RB. I get that Miles likes to punish guys for fumbles, but Hill was producing in the few touches he got in the 1st half, but we neglected him and it cost us.
re: Les just admitted he sat Hill because of the fumble.
Posted by chwsch on 10/21/13 at 1:18 pm to Hat Tricks
quote:
Are you serious with this shite?
Benching Mett after 3 picks really wouldn't be much dumber than sitting Hill after one fumble that we recovered.
The only other halfway decent game is Ole Miss/Missouri. Ole Miss probably won't be ranked even if they win out up till that game. There's a decent chance Mizzou will be undefeated and I'd love it if CBS did pick them over us, but LSU vs A&Manziel is still probably the bigger draw ratings wise.
Ideally you should never hear it said, because it should never be true. But if it's true, I guess I'm fine with the coach admitting it.
I mean, in a game that's decided by a field goal, there are always a million things that could have happened differently that would have changed the result of the game.
As usual for games that come down to the wire, it seems like the majority of the talking heads and bloggers are focusing on the final drive of the game. That was a poor defensive effort to be sure. But even with 3 picks, Ole Miss only scored 10 in the first half. So the defense is also the only reason we were even within striking distance at all.
Overall, Ole Miss played perfectly and got the benefit of subpar efforts on both sides of the ball for LSU. But I don't see how anyone could watch that game and conclude that it was all the defenses fault. It seems silly to point to just one thing when there's plenty of blame to go around, but if forced to, the three picks in the first half were clearly the biggest reason we lost.
As usual for games that come down to the wire, it seems like the majority of the talking heads and bloggers are focusing on the final drive of the game. That was a poor defensive effort to be sure. But even with 3 picks, Ole Miss only scored 10 in the first half. So the defense is also the only reason we were even within striking distance at all.
Overall, Ole Miss played perfectly and got the benefit of subpar efforts on both sides of the ball for LSU. But I don't see how anyone could watch that game and conclude that it was all the defenses fault. It seems silly to point to just one thing when there's plenty of blame to go around, but if forced to, the three picks in the first half were clearly the biggest reason we lost.
Seems like every blog I read want's to talk about how bad the defense was, but all I know is, 3 times in the first half LSU had good field position and was primed to score and gave the ball back to Ole Miss on stupid interceptions, and even still, it was only 10-0 at half-time. Sure our defense wasn't dominant by any stretch, but our defense is the only reason we were even within striking distance in the second half.
re: What former LSU QB you would have liked to see most with Cam as OC?
Posted by chwsch on 10/18/13 at 9:52 am to byubengalboy
ryan perrilloux
re: Espn radio guys think a 1 loss LSU would be the only team to jump Ohio St.
Posted by chwsch on 10/18/13 at 9:33 am to Spaulding Smails
Assuming 2 undefeated teams one of which is Ohio State and the other either being from the PAC, ACC, or Big 12, I think LSU would probably be #3 in both polls behind Ohio State at #2, but we'd likely be #2 in the computers and Ohio State may not even be in the top 10. Currently, at least in Sagarin's BCS computer poll, LSU is #6 and Ohio State is #10. If we win out, we can only move up. Ohio State could win out and still drop since they don't play anyone highly ranked (Michigan is currently 35th in Sagarin's for example).
So yeah, if LSU wins out, and if Ohio State is #2 in the polls, I think the computers will do their job and save us all from having to watch that shitty Ohio State team get destroyed in the NCG and allow us to watch them get destroyed a week sooner in the Rose Bowl.
So yeah, if LSU wins out, and if Ohio State is #2 in the polls, I think the computers will do their job and save us all from having to watch that shitty Ohio State team get destroyed in the NCG and allow us to watch them get destroyed a week sooner in the Rose Bowl.
re: Are we in for Bama-LSU BCS rematch? Teddy Mitrosilis -another great story
Posted by chwsch on 10/15/13 at 11:01 pm to blackjackjackson
Since we're ranked lower this year and already have loss, if we beat Alabama, they will drop further than they did in 2011.
I don't think it'll be a shootout. LSU will have success early and often against Georgia's lack of defense. I think our D will play really well for most or all of the game. The only risk if Georgia can tire out our D late in the game, which does seem to be an issue for us, but I think special teams blunders and/or turnovers will keep them from making it really close.
My aTm friends will be insufferable if they win, but Alabama needs to have at least 2 losses this year.
re: Cam Robinson will announce Friday...now pushed to Wednesday
Posted by chwsch on 8/27/13 at 7:47 pm to GeauxAggie972
shite. I'm usually a total homer about these things, but the timing of all this makes me think he's probably committing to Bama.
Oh well, good luck to the kid either way. Hopefully he signs with the good guys, but one recruit, even an elite one, doesn't make or break a team unless it's a heisman level QB/RB or something.
Oh well, good luck to the kid either way. Hopefully he signs with the good guys, but one recruit, even an elite one, doesn't make or break a team unless it's a heisman level QB/RB or something.
re: What is your favorite LSU shirt?
Posted by chwsch on 8/26/13 at 4:35 pm to King of New Orleans
quote:
I don't wear tshirts to football games.
polos only.
:rotflmao: TOO FUNNY
No way. I'm not saying I'd be disappointed with that result or anything, but even though we are not the odds on favorite to win the SEC and go to the National Championship game, it's not like we don't even have a chance. So yeah, I'm not saying we're a lock to win it all this year or anything stupid like that, but come on, why would anyone put a ceiling on this team even if it meant a guaranteed trip to the Sugar Bowl.
LSU socks = LSU locks
Popular
38
