Favorite team:Tulane 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:381
Registered on:2/18/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
If we don't host, that is probably why (midweek losses), but if we win the first 2 (3) games of the AAC Tournament and ULL doesn't do well in the Sun Belt, I think we host. Our RPI is 27 and went from 35 or 36 to 27 after beating Houston twice, and UH's RPI was in the 60s. At 39 or 40-17, RPI between 22-25, ranked 11-14, with our overall resume, I think we have a very good shot.
D1baseball has basically said one of the lasting hosting spots will come down to USL or Tulane. If we don't host, I don't think they send us to BR two years in a row.
Duester has been the midweek guy for most of the season, but he's also been one of our most consistent pitchers, and when "on," he has the best stuff on the staff. Merrill has been the Friday night starter, but I wouldn't say he's the "ace," and he has struggled with his control his last couple of starts. Also, everyone keeps saying they weren't impressed with Duester, and that's fine, but in the game in Baton Rouge he held LSU to 1 earned run in 5 innings on 4 hits with 3 Ks and 0 BBs. The bullpen imploded when he left the game. And, the real reason he's starting is because Wilmington's lineup is full of lefties, and Duester has the best stuff against lefties.

Lastly, for those saying we're going to go 2 and bbq or 1-2, we might, but I (and a lot of Tulane fans) love what Coach Pierce is doing, and has done all year. He's playing to win the regional, not to win the game. This is completely different than what Rick Jones did. Rick Jones did wonderful things for Tulane baseball, but he often managed scared in big situations (see our performances in Omaha). We're probably not going to do a lot in this regional, but we have a young team, made up of all of Jones' players. We're rebuilding. We haven't been to the postseason since 2008 after going 9 straight years from '98-06 (and again in '08) which included 2 trips to Omaha. Pierce has been to 15 straight postseasons as an assistant and head coach. I'm not sure if we'll get back to where we were in the early 2000s, but we're not going to be where we were from 2007-2014.

re: TULANE

Posted by FW on 4/15/10 at 8:05 pm to
We're starting 1 junior, 3 sophomores and 5 freshman most nights. Of those freshman, Crohan, Boudreaux, Cannizaro are all hitting over .300. Schaffer is having a sophomore slump, but hit over .300 as a freshman last year, so hopefully he can bounce back. The pitching is not young, but we only have 2 seniors, so thhe rest will be back and the freshman class we have coming in next year is all pitchers.

And, we've had great players from out of state (Gautreau, Sutter, Jurries) but we've also had plenty of great in state players (Cannizaro, Aubrey, Manzella).

Katrina wiped out an entire recruiting class (I'm not using it as an excuse), and we're hurt by the new transfer rule, but we lost Schlossnagle after 2001, so that's not a reason we've been down lately, and trust me, losing Kingston was no big loss. Jack Cressand is a much better recruiter, especially on the Northshore.

re: Tulane fans getting fired up ...

Posted by FW on 4/13/10 at 1:14 pm to
Now, back to the game, who is LSU starting?

re: Tulane fans getting fired up ...

Posted by FW on 4/13/10 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

you are delusional


No, not really. I'm sure some of the local kids want to beat LSU more than they want to beat Nicholls or ULM, but there are LSU players who want to beat Tulane more than they want to beat Centenary or Southern, but, again, this isn't 1995, and while I'll admit before Tulane became a national program, beating LSU could make a season for Tulane, this is not the case, and has not been the case for 15 years.

re: Tulane fans getting fired up ...

Posted by FW on 4/13/10 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

FW, you may want to correct this post. This is not correct.


I did. LSU acutally has in the past (not sure if they still do) listed both paid and actual. It would look something like this

Attendance: 7,500 (4,827)

re: Tulane fans getting fired up ...

Posted by FW on 4/13/10 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure what your point is. Are you saying that the fact that every single seat was sold but only half show up (which is not at all the norm nor is it accurate for most games, maybe so when Smoke Laval was here in the latter years) - that shows pathetic fan support? You do realize that if somebody spends money at all on a set of seats, then those fans are supporting LSU whether or not they want to show up or not.

I think Tulane fans criticizing LSU fans on fan support is about like a bum criticizing the home owner whose home he's sleeping in front of because the grass isn't cut.

Shall we discuss Tulane football attendance? Yeah, I didn't think you wanted to.


My point is, that LSU lists "paid" attendance as well as actual attendance. I remember some weekend series back in the early 00s, I think one against Houston, where the Advocate even commented on the games being "sold out" but there being 3,000 people at the game.

I'm not trying to rip LSU's attendance for baseball, it's great, but one thing you can't rip Tulane for is baseball attendance. Basketball and football, knock yourself out.

re: Tulane fans getting fired up ...

Posted by FW on 4/13/10 at 11:58 am to
LSU has better support than Tulane in baseball, but LSU often has a "sellout" and the actual attendance is in the 3,000s. At least this was true in the "Old Box." Not sure how LSU is "actually" drawing now.

Either way, I think most knowledgeable LSU fans know this isn't 1995. Tulane does not treat LSU the same way it did 15 years ago. Whether LSU fans want to believe it or not, Tulane views this as a big mid-week game for RPI purposes, but the players and coaches don't see this is as any bigger of a game than if we were playing a similar type opponent (RPI, Ranking, Record, etc.). Sure we have fans who want to beat LSU more than anything, but don't kid yourselves into thinking you don't have fans who still value a win over Tulane more than a win over Nicholls or another mid-week in-state opponent. And lastly, if you asked every single player on Tulane I can guarantee they'd trade a C-USA win for a midweek win over LSU.

re: re

Posted by FW on 4/4/09 at 10:18 am to
No it most certainly was not. This isn't 1995.

re: re

Posted by FW on 4/3/09 at 3:32 pm to
The 17-12 record means it's not an aberration when we beat you and therefore our team was not celebrating like that because they beat LSU and that made the season, but because it was a dramatic win against the #2 team in the nation at a much needed time in a season where we've lost most of our close games. But continue to think we would rather go 2-54 with those 2 wins being against LSU than 54-2 with 2 losses to LSU.

re: re

Posted by FW on 4/3/09 at 9:02 am to
Is this how LSU usually reacts to losing a midweek game?



Tulane reacted like that because we've had a bad season and just dramatically beat our biggest rival who was ranked #2 in a one run game (we've been horrible in 1 run games this year). Tulane is 17-12 against LSU since 1998, not like we beat y'all for the first time. Trust me, this was not our "CWS" but it does mean more than a win over Nicholls.

And to further emphasize the point, here was Tulane's reaction after dramatically beating Wright State (which I guess by your logic was our "CWS" too)

re: Did Evan Mistich play for Tulane tonight?

Posted by FW on 4/2/09 at 11:37 am to
He's started 12 of 19 games this year and is hitting .256 with 1 HR and 9 RBI. His HR was a big three run bomb at UC-Irvine.