- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics

337tiger504
Favorite team: | LSU ![]() |
Location: | New Orleans |
Biography: | |
Interests: | LSU, Saints |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 9 |
Registered on: | 11/11/2024 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: My little cousin Greg Brooks road to recovery
Posted by 337tiger504 on 2/5/25 at 5:36 pm
quote:
Seriously question, do you think if a direct friend or relative of the physician, or the very rich is not gonna have that MRI ordered for them?
As a physician, no. Lmao. That’s still not how this works.
re: My little cousin Greg Brooks road to recovery
Posted by 337tiger504 on 2/5/25 at 5:33 pm
quote:
If OLOL had someone perform the operation that wasnt a specialist in that kind of surgery then thats on OLOL
That’s another disingenuous element of the story being told by Greg’s dad. If a neurosurgeon isn’t qualified to remove a brain tumor, who is? The lawsuit states that Greg should’ve been treated by a neurosurgeon with further fellowship training in pediatric neurosurgery, but Greg was 22 years old when he had the tumor removed. If a surgeon who’s only trained to operate on adults were to operate on an infant, I could see how that would be unqualified. Not so much a young man in his 20s.
re: My little cousin Greg Brooks road to recovery
Posted by 337tiger504 on 2/5/25 at 5:15 pm
quote:
The kid was unresponsive after surgery before it was even a lawsuit and BK didn’t even pick up the phone to ask how the kid was doing
Just blatantly wrong. From nola.com:
“Two days after Greg Brooks underwent emergency surgery to remove a brain tumor, coach Brian Kelly visited him in the hospital.
Effects of heavy sedation had not worn off, so Kelly could not have a full conversation Sunday with LSU’s fifth-year senior safety. But Kelly knew what Brooks had expressed before the operation.
‘He was pretty clear about playing again this year,’ said Kelly, chuckling. ‘That's Greg Brooks.’”
LINK
re: My little cousin Greg Brooks road to recovery
Posted by 337tiger504 on 2/5/25 at 4:55 pm
quote:
Coaches failed him
Spoken like a true University of Slow Learners fan. And from Sulphur, no less…
re: Greg Brooks Jr GMA Interview
Posted by 337tiger504 on 2/5/25 at 4:49 pm
This is the most ghetto mindset a person could possibly have lmao what
re: K. Lacy wanted on negligent homicide and hit and run
Posted by 337tiger504 on 1/10/25 at 7:30 pm
Damn, the agent couldn’t even throw in a RIP for the victim? That’s fricked
re: K. Lacy wanted on negligent homicide and hit and run
Posted by 337tiger504 on 1/10/25 at 7:27 pm
quote:
The law clearly states that 1. Vehicular homicide A. Vehicular homicide is the killing of a human being caused proximately or caused directly by an offender engaged in the operation of, or in actual physical control of, any motor vehicle
…, aircraft, watercraft, or other means of conveyance, whether or not the offender had the intent to cause death or great bodily harm, whenever any of the following conditions exists and such condition was a contributing factor to the killing:
(1) The operator is impaired by alcoholic beverages as determined by chemical tests administered under the provisions of R.S. 32:662.
(2) The operator's blood alcohol concentration is 0.08 percent or more by weight based upon grams of alcohol per one hundred cubic centimeters of blood.
(3)(a) The operator is impaired by any other drug, combination of drugs, or combination of alcohol and drugs.
(b) As used in this Section, the term "drug" means any substance or combination of substances that, when taken into the human body, can impair the ability of the person to operate a vehicle safely.
(4) The operator is impaired by alcoholic beverages.
(5) The operator's blood has any detectable amount of any controlled dangerous substance listed in Schedule I, II, III, or IV as set forth in R.S. 40:964, or a metabolite of such controlled dangerous substance, that has not been medically ordered or prescribed for the individual.
There, I finished the statute for you. This is why Lacy is deservedly being charged with negligent homicide, not vehicular homicide. Two different crimes that everyone in this thread seems to be mixing up.
re: K. Lacy wanted on negligent homicide and hit and run
Posted by 337tiger504 on 1/10/25 at 7:13 pm
quote:
The drunk driver who cant think ended his own life. Hes just looking for someone to blame it on and a payday.
Assuming that the Marine is the one you’re referring to as “the drunk driver”… If you were literate, you’d know that the Marine wasn’t the one who swerved his car and collided with another car. The Marine’s car was hit by the car that swerved into the middle of the road.
re: K. Lacy wanted on negligent homicide and hit and run
Posted by 337tiger504 on 1/10/25 at 7:09 pm
quote:
Also - the donut shop would have been closed at the time of the accident so there was zero reason for him to be going there.
Mmm, no. That donut shop is open well before and after 10 am, seven days a week. (The donut shop was definitely not Lacy’s destination, though.)
Popular