- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Yetna72
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 3 |
| Registered on: | 4/3/2024 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
It bloody well is mate when you overlook the longterm effect, which he’s paying for now. All he heard was $2,000 to pocket for extra this & that. That’s how those big corps do. They dangle fruit in front of the poor to avoid a legal battle.
0
The article recently about the guy in Zachary, Pigrenet, who took the $2,000 before thinking about the longterm effects of the diversion canal project. Well how about, the Florida Gas Company on Lower Zachary Road did the same thing and redirected their water runoff to the neighbors ditches on both sides of the street. Now they have huge unwanted lilies/plants living in their ditches and water is in a constant pool. Never dries up, even during hot summer. Residents can’t maintain their ditches, because it’s too wet. What can be done legally i’d like to know. If the residents pool their money together and get a lawyer, that be one good payout.
Yes, they hate the redirect on their narrative.
Popular
33
