- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 5 |
| Registered on: | 3/15/2022 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Congress has a bill authorizing Letters of Marque to seize the property of Russians abroad
Posted by SloJoe on 3/22/22 at 1:30 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
quote:
Letters of Marque
Doesn’t the Constitution prohibit such? Therefore it’d take an amendment to change.
Other way around. It's still an enumerated power of Congress listed in the Constitution, Article I, Section 8.
0
re: Congress has a bill authorizing Letters of Marque to seize the property of Russians abroad
Posted by SloJoe on 3/22/22 at 12:52 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
quote:
Yes we are. I love how the Dems are digging up laws that are still on the books, but are hundreds of years old.
quote:
Sponsor:Rep. Gooden, Lance [R-TX-5] (Introduced 02/28/2022)
Ron Paul introduced a similar bill in 2001.
LINK
How did the other media censor them?
quote:
quote:
President Trump had his day in court. He lost something like 50 or 60 cases.
How many of those cases allowed discovery?
You mean in how many of them did Trump's lawyers ask for and convince the Court to grant it?
You've got to make a case to get expedited discovery you know.
That's my point. Trump's lawyers couldn't make a case to get what they wanted, and the burden was on them.
Sucks, but that's our system.
quote:
Proof isn’t proof unless court imbeciles accept it?
That's how our system works, right? If you're accused of a crime, the burden of proof falls on the State. Same for a lawsuit. The person bringing the suit has the burden of proof.
And if you want a judge to issue an injunction to overturn an election, you gotta have some evidence of serious fraud.
President Trump had his day in court. He lost something like 50 or 60 cases.
What's left to do?
Popular
28
