Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Virginia
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:13
Registered on:10/9/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I can't forget these documents the FBI released last year that suggest Mueller and Clinton were behind his murder.
LINK
Except it didn't need to be classified, was declassified and ordered to be released to the public in a signed memorandum. Personally, I'm more concerned the DOJ didn't follow through with a legal presidential order. This attack on a basic executive power either means something or it means nothing. Can't be both.
Why would you defend the corrupt political norm? Dems used to hate the establishment...now they cheer them on and think everything they say is true without an ounce of research verifying what they hear. I'm reminded of clapping seals.
I assure you, because of this bone-headed solution, the cost of education will only go higher.
I have a fairly decent timeline going on General Flynn:

LINK
Yes, Biden's participation was admitted in the infamous Susan Rice January 20, 2017 email. Although I would say Obama orchestrated it. He had it out for Flynn since his release of a DIA report that stated Obama and Hillary were arming and training ISIS in Syria. It's complicated. lol
LINK
“President Trump declassified a binder on January 19th, 2021 that contains hundreds of pages about the Crossfire Hurricane scandal. It contains damaging information about the corrupt actors involved with our government. Two different DOJ Attorney Generals have defied President Trump’s direct lawful order to publish the binder in the Federal Register. It’s been 19 months as the DOJ defies the order, and every FOIA request to make it public."

LINK
I think it depends on what kind of information is leaked. The Pentagon Papers were rightfully released because they exposed gross government corruption and lies and so that leak was for the public good. The same with Assange and Wikileaks...massive amount of corruption exposed. However, when James Wolfe leaked Carter Page's FISA application, a federal prosecutor opened an investigation because there was sensitive national security info about Page's previous history with the FBI and CIA. Even the FISA application is highly classified, so in that regard, they will go after the media like they did to Ali Watkins at the NYT who exposed Carter Page's FISA warrant. LINK
Let me change that a little so you understand reality. Georgia, Serbia, Bosnia, Ukraine...all Eastern European countries that border Russia, were supposed to remain neutral countries after WWII according to treaties we signed.

Clinton/Obama/Trump/Biden changed that and turned those countries into NATO military zones on Russia's border.

Ukraine was supposed to remain neutral but America armed their neo-Nazi militias and filtered them into Ukraine's National Guard since Victoria Nuland's 2014 coup. Then they attacked the people in Donbass and Crimea. 87% of the people in Crimea voted for a referendum to be annexed back into Russia for protection from the neo-Nazis. Donbass didn't ask Russia for protection (even though the majority there are of Russian descent as well) and over 14,000 people have been killed by the neo-Nazi militias since 2014.

History should tell you Russia doesn't like Nazis on their border (or dangerous biolabs). It should also tell you that America sucks at honoring treaties.
Thank you. I thought I stumbled into Stupidville. After the 2014 coup, Ukraine became the money laundering capitol of the world for the globalist scum ruling over us. They stole $10's of billions from that poor country via USAID, PEPFAR, IMF, etc., funds. Lots of evidence and witnesses they would love to see disappeared. What better way than a war, and to see Russia do it would have been an absolute delicious irony for these ghouls. 87% of the people in Crimea asked for and voted on a referendum allowing Russia to protect them from the ultranationalists militias coming out of Kiev. Russia didn't just take that land. The local civilians begged them for help. Americans are uninformed about Ukraine (understandably), and if you're believing what they tell you on da teeeveee, then you're wandering in the dark and it shows.

I have to laugh at the Dems who responded to Mahncke's Twitter post, suggesting it's perfectly normal and fine for private citizens to spy on the president's internet activity while in the Oval Office.

I was just looking for more info on this story when I happened upon your excellent post. I'm entering this latest Durham filing in a now massive timeline where we have been chronicling and tagging this Clinton scandal, among many others. All searches and tags appear in chronological order. Hope some find it useful and Durham's info is in the abbreviated Investigations timeline.
LINK
Remember when? What changed?

"Should the American public be allowed to view the draft indictment of Hillary Clinton over the Whitewater case? Judicial Watch, the organization founded to promote transparency in government, has sued to make the allegations against her public.

According to Judicial Watch:

The draft indictments relate to allegations that Clinton provided false information and withheld evidence from federal investigators to conceal her involvement with the defunct Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan, the collapse of which lead to multiple criminal convictions. Clinton provided legal representation to Madison Guaranty as an attorney at the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas. Clinton’s Rose Law Firm billing records, long sought by prosecutors, were found in the private quarters of the White House shortly after an important statute of limitations had expired.

But the National Archives argues that Clinton’s privacy must be protected in this instance.

LINK