Favorite team:Oklahoma 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:432
Registered on:7/28/2021
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
You mean Baja Oklahoma. We're coming for that land.

From the river to the gulf...

...shite, "orange" gets all the glory for being unrhymable, but "gulf" is a motherfricker too. So much for making up a catchy chant.

re: Hey Texas, part two

Posted by umop sujoH on 4/12/26 at 5:51 pm to
Yep, any time you can leave Austin with the series, it's a good weekend.

Stewie definitely broke our hearts in the 8th after the 7th-inning comeback to take the lead, but no one can say it wasn't exciting. My guts are still a little knotted up nearly two hours later.

The way the forecast looked coming into the weekend, I thought we'd be lucky to get a full game in, and Friday night, it still seemed like that would play out. Last two games were perfect timing with the weather. Lightning announced near the stadium just as the game ended today.
Depends on the type of gap we're talking about.

A good college team is most likely to beat a pro team on any given day in baseball due to the nature of the game. It's not terribly rare for bottom-feeder college teams to beat elite teams because elite teams slump and can't get hits all the time. This is much more likely to happen in baseball than other other two sports

But I'd say baseball also has the biggest talent gap by far between D1 and MLB because so much of the talent pool skips college and goes straight to the minors, especially the elite talent.
I might be the crazy one here, but I watch softball because the game itself is enjoyable. Those big ol' bruisers that knock it out of the park are some of the most exciting players on the field.

I occasionally watch women play volleyball for the view, but I care very little about the outcome of any given match. Are they called matches? See? I don't care.

I've managed to go my entire life enjoying football without ever being attracted to a single player on the field. An attractive softball player (or even a bit of a butterface with a nice arse) is a bonus, I suppose, but I'm not watching for that reason.
Rhoads is absolutely an elite venue...a huge stadium with great fans. It's on my short list of SEC travel destinations I need to visit.

The first D1 softball (or any softball really) that caught my attention was the 2012 national championship series when Bama beat OU. I had no idea it could be such an entertaining sport.

I watched only the late postseason for quite a few years after that because it was about all that was on TV. Then in 2021, I decided to start paying attention to the entire season. It was still a lot of listening on the radio while at work, even that recently.

But the last three years, nearly all the games started being televised, even if it was just a single camera behind home plate in the early season. This year, every single game has had multiple cameras, and it's fantastic.
I knew you'd be good for getting some softball talk going. :cheers:

Bama looks better than they have in a while. Looks like they're about to take the series vs #1 Texas. Good...soften 'em up for OU next weekend.
quote:

Did I see where Oklahoma schedule was one of the weakest in the nation? No wonder they’ve got the stats.

Ranked 108 as of Sunday


What's your source?

According to RPI, they have the 11th toughest schedule to date and the 4th toughest going forward.

Warren Nolan

Massey
You could have waited a few more days and actually been correct.
So many scrotums would be torn off. :lol:

re: I hate Alabama. BUT…

Posted by umop sujoH on 12/8/25 at 1:17 pm to
I recall ND getting similar special treatment (at least at times) during the BCS and 4-team playoff eras.

I would have liked to have played ND in the first round for the variety, but at the same time, I think Bama was the right call...especially after seeing how ND has showed its arse after being "snubbed."
Who is healthy will play a big part for both teams.

re: Cfb needs 16 team playoff

Posted by umop sujoH on 12/6/25 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

There is no legitimate reason to go beyond 4. Even 4 is iffy most years.


This is correct. 2 was fine most years, but there was occasionally a third team that deserved a shot. 4 was as close to ideal as it was gonna get.

The only thing that's changed that makes me okay with 8 or 12 teams is the way the non-playoff bowls have become meaningless with opt-outs the last few years.

If we could find a way to make the other bowls matter again, I'd go right back to wanting a 4-team playoff. I don't see it happening though.
Bedlam originated with wrestling, a sport in which both schools are blue bloods, but OSU is historically the best program in the country by far....dozens of NCs, I think.

I don't follow wrestling, but I believe OU (with Mizzou) still wrestles in the BIG 12, so Bedlam lives on as it was meant to be. Good for them.

As for football, Mike Gundy and T Boone made something of their program in the 2000s, and there were plenty of exciting games in the series after that. Oklahoma still won the vast majority, but several came down to wire.

But historically, it just wasn't that important for OU. OSU hated our guts, and we were aware of their existence. That's not to sound superior, but the programs were on very different levels.

Bedlam in any sport besides wrestling was manufactured for TV ratings--and I'm sure to try to build excitement within the fan bases. It always felt artificial to me.

And as mentioned above, when they began scheduling it at the end of the season to replace Nebraska, it felt gross. OU-NU mattered on the national stage for decades. Thanksgiving in Stillwater is not Thanksgiving in Lincoln by a far stretch.

I still hold out hope that Nebraska can get back to where they want to be, and we can bring back the non-conference rivalry every year. Conversely, I don't care if OU plays OSU twice a decade or never again.
Here's another fun one for the "rivalry" since it's been brought up that OU and Mizzou used to play for the Peace Pipe back in the old days.

From 1902-1945, it did indeed look like a rivalry. The record was 16-16-4. Can't get closer than that.

Since then (post-WWII), it's 59-9-1.

And that includes the best of the Pinkel years when they were really rolling and their QB ate a booger on live TV....the glory years of MU football, as they were.

re: OU @ Rocky Top Red Nov Video

Posted by umop sujoH on 11/4/25 at 2:08 am to
What an incredible environment for a nighttime college football game. Huge respect to the Tennessee fans and that program, stadium crew and all involved. It's exactly what makes college football better than any other sport in the world.
We might not beat you this millennium either, but rest assured, it's coming.

re: Oklahoma ... lol

Posted by umop sujoH on 10/12/25 at 10:25 am to
That's a reasonable take as well. There are always what-ifs to wonder about.

The way both offenses were performing, we can guess that anything different might have helped. But Hawkins could have also had a turnover party of his own. It's happened before.

I agree that the clock management before the half was idiotic. As well as OU was moving the ball then...just so very stupid.

re: Oklahoma ... lol

Posted by umop sujoH on 10/12/25 at 9:03 am to
quote:

...but Oklahoma thought he was the better option which speaks to their team not being deep enough.


There is a significant drop-off from a healthy Mateer to Hawkins. Yesterday? Hard to say. By the time it was clear that Mateer didn't belong out there, it was pretty much too late anyway.

When Texas took the momentum late in the second quarter and OU's defense looked gassed, it already wasn't looking good. You can't blame all of that on the hand.
The spread has flipped to OU -1.5.

Don't know how much of that is Mateer's upgrade to probable or just the late money being different. I'd guess the former, but I'm not a bettor except for the rare small stuff between friends. So it's not much of an educated guess.

Curious to see where it lands at game time.