- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
umop sujoH
| Favorite team: | Oklahoma |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 422 |
| Registered on: | 7/28/2021 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: I hate Alabama. BUT…
Posted by umop sujoH on 12/8/25 at 1:17 pm to Goalpost
I recall ND getting similar special treatment (at least at times) during the BCS and 4-team playoff eras.
I would have liked to have played ND in the first round for the variety, but at the same time, I think Bama was the right call...especially after seeing how ND has showed its arse after being "snubbed."
I would have liked to have played ND in the first round for the variety, but at the same time, I think Bama was the right call...especially after seeing how ND has showed its arse after being "snubbed."
re: Get in here if you made the playoffs
Posted by umop sujoH on 12/7/25 at 12:10 pm to theballguy
:cheers:
re: Bama vs Oklahoma round 2 who you got?
Posted by umop sujoH on 12/7/25 at 11:48 am to crimsoncoded94
Who is healthy will play a big part for both teams.
re: Cfb needs 16 team playoff
Posted by umop sujoH on 12/6/25 at 12:16 pm to 3down10
quote:
There is no legitimate reason to go beyond 4. Even 4 is iffy most years.
This is correct. 2 was fine most years, but there was occasionally a third team that deserved a shot. 4 was as close to ideal as it was gonna get.
The only thing that's changed that makes me okay with 8 or 12 teams is the way the non-playoff bowls have become meaningless with opt-outs the last few years.
If we could find a way to make the other bowls matter again, I'd go right back to wanting a 4-team playoff. I don't see it happening though.
re: How do you OU fans feel with the absence of Bedlam
Posted by umop sujoH on 11/24/25 at 12:01 am to TideTurf
Bedlam originated with wrestling, a sport in which both schools are blue bloods, but OSU is historically the best program in the country by far....dozens of NCs, I think.
I don't follow wrestling, but I believe OU (with Mizzou) still wrestles in the BIG 12, so Bedlam lives on as it was meant to be. Good for them.
As for football, Mike Gundy and T Boone made something of their program in the 2000s, and there were plenty of exciting games in the series after that. Oklahoma still won the vast majority, but several came down to wire.
But historically, it just wasn't that important for OU. OSU hated our guts, and we were aware of their existence. That's not to sound superior, but the programs were on very different levels.
Bedlam in any sport besides wrestling was manufactured for TV ratings--and I'm sure to try to build excitement within the fan bases. It always felt artificial to me.
And as mentioned above, when they began scheduling it at the end of the season to replace Nebraska, it felt gross. OU-NU mattered on the national stage for decades. Thanksgiving in Stillwater is not Thanksgiving in Lincoln by a far stretch.
I still hold out hope that Nebraska can get back to where they want to be, and we can bring back the non-conference rivalry every year. Conversely, I don't care if OU plays OSU twice a decade or never again.
I don't follow wrestling, but I believe OU (with Mizzou) still wrestles in the BIG 12, so Bedlam lives on as it was meant to be. Good for them.
As for football, Mike Gundy and T Boone made something of their program in the 2000s, and there were plenty of exciting games in the series after that. Oklahoma still won the vast majority, but several came down to wire.
But historically, it just wasn't that important for OU. OSU hated our guts, and we were aware of their existence. That's not to sound superior, but the programs were on very different levels.
Bedlam in any sport besides wrestling was manufactured for TV ratings--and I'm sure to try to build excitement within the fan bases. It always felt artificial to me.
And as mentioned above, when they began scheduling it at the end of the season to replace Nebraska, it felt gross. OU-NU mattered on the national stage for decades. Thanksgiving in Stillwater is not Thanksgiving in Lincoln by a far stretch.
I still hold out hope that Nebraska can get back to where they want to be, and we can bring back the non-conference rivalry every year. Conversely, I don't care if OU plays OSU twice a decade or never again.
re: Oklahoma has beaten Midzou 18 straight times in Norman
Posted by umop sujoH on 11/18/25 at 6:23 pm to TulsaSooner78
Here's another fun one for the "rivalry" since it's been brought up that OU and Mizzou used to play for the Peace Pipe back in the old days.
From 1902-1945, it did indeed look like a rivalry. The record was 16-16-4. Can't get closer than that.
Since then (post-WWII), it's 59-9-1.
And that includes the best of the Pinkel years when they were really rolling and their QB ate a booger on live TV....the glory years of MU football, as they were.
From 1902-1945, it did indeed look like a rivalry. The record was 16-16-4. Can't get closer than that.
Since then (post-WWII), it's 59-9-1.
And that includes the best of the Pinkel years when they were really rolling and their QB ate a booger on live TV....the glory years of MU football, as they were.
re: OU @ Rocky Top Red Nov Video
Posted by umop sujoH on 11/4/25 at 2:08 am to OU Guy
What an incredible environment for a nighttime college football game. Huge respect to the Tennessee fans and that program, stadium crew and all involved. It's exactly what makes college football better than any other sport in the world.
re: Hey OU, get in here you classic old rival of ours
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/24/25 at 3:22 pm to ManBearSharkReb
We might not beat you this millennium either, but rest assured, it's coming.
re: Oklahoma ... lol
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/12/25 at 10:25 am to OU Guy
That's a reasonable take as well. There are always what-ifs to wonder about.
The way both offenses were performing, we can guess that anything different might have helped. But Hawkins could have also had a turnover party of his own. It's happened before.
I agree that the clock management before the half was idiotic. As well as OU was moving the ball then...just so very stupid.
The way both offenses were performing, we can guess that anything different might have helped. But Hawkins could have also had a turnover party of his own. It's happened before.
I agree that the clock management before the half was idiotic. As well as OU was moving the ball then...just so very stupid.
re: Oklahoma ... lol
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/12/25 at 9:03 am to Jobu93
quote:
...but Oklahoma thought he was the better option which speaks to their team not being deep enough.
There is a significant drop-off from a healthy Mateer to Hawkins. Yesterday? Hard to say. By the time it was clear that Mateer didn't belong out there, it was pretty much too late anyway.
When Texas took the momentum late in the second quarter and OU's defense looked gassed, it already wasn't looking good. You can't blame all of that on the hand.
re: We should all go on the record with our Oklahoma versus Texas score predictions
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/10/25 at 3:16 pm to hookem33
The spread has flipped to OU -1.5.
Don't know how much of that is Mateer's upgrade to probable or just the late money being different. I'd guess the former, but I'm not a bettor except for the rare small stuff between friends. So it's not much of an educated guess.
Curious to see where it lands at game time.
Don't know how much of that is Mateer's upgrade to probable or just the late money being different. I'd guess the former, but I'm not a bettor except for the rare small stuff between friends. So it's not much of an educated guess.
Curious to see where it lands at game time.
re: We should all go on the record with our Oklahoma versus Texas score predictions
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/10/25 at 1:01 am to SoonerInTheFort
With JM now listed as probable, I'll go 19-15 OU...with each team getting a safety and at least one team with a defensive TD.
Might as well get specific and stupid because predicting this game is a fool's errand.
Might as well get specific and stupid because predicting this game is a fool's errand.
re: Throwback Uniforms
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/9/25 at 11:13 pm to TrlAg
Helmets look great.
re: The real Mateer scoop from the Tortilla Presser guy (updated Thu)
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/8/25 at 10:31 pm to OU Guy
Sounds like they nailed his thumb back on, and we're good to go. I like it!
re: Texas Tech is one of the biggest winners from NIL and conference realignment
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 11:57 pm to Dr RC
It appears you're right about the coaches. Most of the KSU fans were bitter because those coaches were "distracted" and allegedly working for OU when they should have been preparing for the game...which of course sounds like fan excuses as well. But I couldn't find anything about them not being there.
I wasn't just making it up though. That's what I've been told happened for years (by KSU fans...one in particular has been especially bitchy about OU stealing all the coaches and ruining their NC year), and the way Bob talked about it too, I just assumed it was all true. Evidently not. Stoops wasn't nearly as heartless as they made him out to be, which I'm glad to learn.
But I also wasn't trying to asterisk away your win. I truly have (or had) no preference who won that game. I have no affection or dislike for either school. I just thought it was an interesting story...a bullshite story, it seems, but I fell for it.
I wasn't just making it up though. That's what I've been told happened for years (by KSU fans...one in particular has been especially bitchy about OU stealing all the coaches and ruining their NC year), and the way Bob talked about it too, I just assumed it was all true. Evidently not. Stoops wasn't nearly as heartless as they made him out to be, which I'm glad to learn.
But I also wasn't trying to asterisk away your win. I truly have (or had) no preference who won that game. I have no affection or dislike for either school. I just thought it was an interesting story...a bullshite story, it seems, but I fell for it.
re: Texas Tech is one of the biggest winners from NIL and conference realignment
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 12:24 pm to truth22
I've heard K-State fans bitch about it for 25+ years as the reason they went to shite their last two games that year. I've seen Bob talk about feeling guilty doing that to Snyder, but he needed a staff in Norman as soon as possible to start recruiting.
But I'm not sure about Mangino now that I think about it. He may have come in the following year after Leach left for Tech. Or maybe he did come with the others and was just promoted after Leach left.
But I'm not sure about Mangino now that I think about it. He may have come in the following year after Leach left for Tech. Or maybe he did come with the others and was just promoted after Leach left.
re: reform bill could generate extra billions by allowing conferences to pool their TV rights
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 11:17 am to Crimson K
Yep. It's the non-P2 schools trying to level the playing field.
Or put another way, trying to commie a big chunk of the Big Ten and SEC's TV money for themselves.
Or put another way, trying to commie a big chunk of the Big Ten and SEC's TV money for themselves.
re: Texas Tech is one of the biggest winners from NIL and conference realignment
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 10:41 am to AGGIES
That sounds like something Mushmouth would do. He had a habit of totally ignoring one team.
People forget how good the original Big 12 was, the North in the beginning, with the South dominating in the 2000s. People definitely forget that elite defense was played alongside those legendary offenses. It was tough going.
People forget how good the original Big 12 was, the North in the beginning, with the South dominating in the 2000s. People definitely forget that elite defense was played alongside those legendary offenses. It was tough going.
re: Unbiased OU/TX Red River Shootout and related history
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 8:32 am to OU Guy
That's awesome! I came along a little too late to take part in the best of craziness on Commerce the night before the game. But man, the stories...
Thousands of drunks from two groups who despised each other congregating in one spot...and getting drunker by the minute. What could possibly go wrong?
Overcrowded hospitals from the brawls that broke out and even the occasional death.
Hundreds of people paying their public intox fines and getting out of jail Saturday morning, just in time to get to the fairgrounds for the game.
Really wish I could have been there. :lol:
Thousands of drunks from two groups who despised each other congregating in one spot...and getting drunker by the minute. What could possibly go wrong?
Overcrowded hospitals from the brawls that broke out and even the occasional death.
Hundreds of people paying their public intox fines and getting out of jail Saturday morning, just in time to get to the fairgrounds for the game.
Really wish I could have been there. :lol:
re: Texas Tech is one of the biggest winners from NIL and conference realignment
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 8:16 am to Dr RC
quote:
Hey man, we kicked the Big 12's arse in 1998. Even ruined KSU's GOAT season in the process.
That '98 KSU team was incredible and had a great chance to win the NC...BUT...
Bob Stoops had just been hired at OU and totally raided the K-State coaching staff before the Big 12 Championship.
He took: Mike Stoops, Brent Venables, Mark Mangino and maybe more. I can't remember. Totally fricked KSU's best season ever.
(And Tech-related, he also got Mike Leach from Kentucky.)
So A&M played against a great team that was missing their most important coaches, and didn't you win by a FG in double-overtime?
I'm not saying the conference title shouldn't count or anything like that. Of course it should and does. However, A&M did come into that game under a very fortunate set of circumstances.
re: Unbiased OU/TX Red River Shootout and related history
Posted by umop sujoH on 10/7/25 at 6:15 am to OU Guy
Thanks for sharing! I love CFB history and have heard or read many of these stories a lot over the years. But there were a few things that were new to me. Very cool!
Popular
0











